On (02/06 21:31), Chris Fedde wrote: > 1.0 is a line in the sand. To some it implies a commitment to interface. To > others it means yet another buggy .0 release. If my opinion matters at all > I'd say hit 0.5 and 0.8 before jumping to 1.0. Then move quickly to 1.1.
so you're against lines? or sand? :) so you're saying to make the jump to 0.5 so our arbitrary version jump doesnt mean anything else to anyone? or what? kinda confused as to what jumping to 0.5 would get us that 1.0 wouldnt? -- Matt Cashner http://eekeek.org eek at eekeek dot org
