On Fri, 2004-02-06 at 20:31, Chris Fedde wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:38:24 -0500  sungo wrote:
>  +------------------
>  | So, there are my  thoughts. I would like comments, thoughts,
>  | suggestions, etc etc. Silence is assumed assent. So speak up if you have
>  | objections, concerns, etc.
>  +------------------
> 
> 1.0 is a line in the sand.  To some it implies a commitment to interface.  To
> others it means yet another buggy .0 release.  If my opinion matters at all
> I'd say hit 0.5 and 0.8 before jumping to 1.0. Then move quickly to 1.1.
> 
> 

To me a version number is nothing more than a loose representation of
where the author thinks the code is in terms of stability and the only
rule for versions is it must be changed from release to release. Just
MHO.

Cheers,

Scott

-- 
Scott Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gossamer Threads

Reply via email to