> > On 06-Aug-2004 Rocco Caputo wrote: > > The reasons for or against a loader class are fuzzy judgment calls, > > not good vs. evil issues. One negative aspect I can think of offhand > > is that it makes class loading more complex. You should decide > > whether the convenience outweighs the complexity. Consider that the > > margin is ten characters narrower using "PoCo" (or even POEx, to > > follow in DBIx's footsteps). > > Let me through my vote in for POEx. > > -Philip > >
I'll add another. I think at the very least POE (with the 'E') needs to stay intact. I know the "chatting" convention has been to use 'PoCo', but to keep the two related I think the full 'POE' spelling needs to be included. The 'x' form definitely aligns well with the DBI -> DBIx pre-existing example. http://danconia.org
