2009/11/20 Rocco Caputo <rcap...@pobox.com> > Agreed, a _child(lose) before the _child(create) is bad. >
This a case of _child(lose) without any _child(create) ever (neither before or after). > It should either be a _child(create)/_child(lose) pair, or nothing in this > case. I'm tempted to go with "nothing" since it would be hard to fix the > create/lose timing. I'm tempted to go with "nothing", as the session is declared detached. > Also the new(detached => 1) seems good, but I admit I haven't given it much > though yet. Sometimes I change my mind after thinking about things too > hard. > > If you haven't already, please submit this to bug-...@rt.cpan.org. I'm > liable to forget about POE bugs, patches, tests, etc. if they're not in > POE's bug tracker. > See bug #51772. > Thank you again for all your help. POE is helping me much, so thanks to you. It helped me to build my application during the last 9 months. However, debugging is painful and I'm still tracking a particular bug in my code for 3 weeks now. I just discovered POE::API::Peek and it looks like it is the toolbox I was looking for for months. Olivier.
