From: "acoliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If we do decide to put any portion of that under POI it would probably be
on
> an independant release schedule. The intent of formal "releases" is to
tie
> things up to make sure there is always something that is runnable and
bring
> sanity back to things. If we're always pefecting and never "making it
work"
> then we never "produce" anything that works and things can get insane real
> quick.
Yes, probably I didn't explain myself correctly.
We are thinking on what to do with the XML stuff, but there is no real
decision yet.
> The XML stuff would be dissimilar to everything else so that there would
be
> no reason for it to be released with everything else, just depend upon it.
Of course.
> It should have a release schedule, just no idea yet what that would be.
It
> seems Sylvain has lost interest in the POI community and issues
surrounding
> this
I don't think so, but I won't speak for him of course.
> so we can now just work out with Scott Sanders who's interested in
> using this functionality and anyone interested in contributing to this
> effort, how to get it sanctioned out.
>
> Perhaps you should open the discussion on what you propose, clearly lay it
> out and lets start talking about what to do with it.
Ok, I'll write it now.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
