> Excel can actually have some high order number of rows. We're currently limited > to Short.MAX_VALUE because we don't know how to do relative row numbers. We > should figure this out at some point.
Would that be something to do with DBCellRecord?
> Excel can actually have some high order number of rows. We're currently limited > to Short.MAX_VALUE because we don't know how to do relative row numbers. We > should figure this out at some point.
Would that be something to do with DBCellRecord?