I don't think so. DBCell is for performance. I chose not to implement it because it required pointers from the IndexRecord. Upstream pointers to downstream thing...yuck. I could be wrong about that.
On Sun, 2002-03-31 at 05:21, Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > > > Excel can actually have some high order number of rows. We're currently > limited > > to Short.MAX_VALUE because we don't know how to do relative row numbers. > We > > should figure this out at some point. > > Would that be something to do with DBCellRecord? > > > > -- http://www.superlinksoftware.com http://jakarta.apache.org/poi - port of Excel/Word/OLE 2 Compound Document format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh
