From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> AFAIK, Not really possible.  Check style checks a number of pedantic
> things that the formatter doesn't.  (And Checkstyle is really annoying
> with some of those)  This would cause the formatter to run repetitively.
>  If CheckStyle provided its own pedantic formatter then it would
> work...but it doesn't (to the best of my knowledge).

Yes, this is a *potential* problem.

But we can tell checkstyle to ignore some things, and we should put a
threshold only on what the formatter can fix.

--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to