From: "Rainer Klute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -1 for a general and automatic reformatting. I don't like my
> code to be crunched by some tool in a way I do not like. When I
> write down code, I have my reasons for how I am doing it. Others
> may like my style or not. I'd hate no work on source code I once
> wrote and now don't recognize any more.
>
> +1 for manual and optional reformatting done by each author on
> his own code.
But the authors won't do it.
What I proposed is in between: the code is reformatted *only* if it fails
more than X number of checkstyle tests.
This way if the code you write is mainly in line, it will not be changed.
If not , it will.
This would solve your problem, since code that doesn't break (the loose
standards we have) will remain untouched.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
