On 7/22/03 4:45 PM, "Chris Nokleberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 04:35:43PM -0400, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: >> Right, I guess what I'm looking for is more of a technical analysis.. >> Meaning look at the code behind POIFS and say "yes we can merge the two into >> one" or "no the two are totally different" >> >> You know your code, you can see our code, so if you put the two side by >> side... That kind of thing. >> >> Does your API write? Can we integrate the write support, etc etc. > > Yes, it writes. > > To be honest I was anticipating more or less replacing the current POIFS > code with what we have. Well, to start I'd write a wrapper so that the > existing unit tests could still be used. To keep as much as possible of > POIFS will probably require significantly more work, but I'll take a > closer look in the next day or so. > Great.. Bring the community up to speed. We'll need to do some legwork to make sure its faster, sleeker, etc. -andy > Chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
