It is bogus, yes, but I would be strongly against API changes at this change. We dont want people to have compilation problems when moving from RC1 to RC2 or 2final. It isnt a big deal technically, but may be very painful psycologically..
Lets do it for 3.. i'll do it myself. On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 21:12, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > Lets change that constant for 2.0. Its totally bogus. ENCODING_DOUBLE_BYTE > and ENCODING_SINGLE_BYTE make sense. The constant has nothing to do with > whether or not UTF_8 or 16 are used in truth. I just had no real clue about > character encoding when I made it. What do you guys think? If yes, then > I'll fix it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
