maybe by then the automatic encoding detection patch will be commited... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Avik Sengupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "POI Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:08 PM Subject: Re: Character encoding
> It is bogus, yes, but I would be strongly against API changes at this > change. We dont want people to have compilation problems when moving > from RC1 to RC2 or 2final. It isnt a big deal technically, but may be > very painful psycologically.. > > Lets do it for 3.. i'll do it myself. > > On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 21:12, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > Lets change that constant for 2.0. Its totally bogus. ENCODING_DOUBLE_BYTE > > and ENCODING_SINGLE_BYTE make sense. The constant has nothing to do with > > whether or not UTF_8 or 16 are used in truth. I just had no real clue about > > character encoding when I made it. What do you guys think? If yes, then > > I'll fix it. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
