On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:59:27 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay but we're not committing to it yet. We need people familiar and I > need time to test against OS X which I don't have ATM. I know for sure > we don't want to be the first project after velocity and oro ;-) > > We should go after tomcat :-) If you don't hose tomcat, you sure won't > hose us ;-) > > -Andy
Commons, Site2, Regexp should move pretty soon. I just nudged Cactus and they seem pretty willing to go soon. I need to nudge Turbine again to remind myself where they are. ECS, BCEL should move pretty quickly after that. Which is half of Jakarta if you ignore the dead two. So definitely not using you as guinea pigs :) (that was the rest of Apache). If we work out a structural plan for the svn repo; and get a test one setup; then some of the questions can be answered. To that end, is POI your classic single codebase to single jar? Are there multiple different codebases and targets? Any weirdness to do with the binary MS formats that have been a problem in CVS (test files and newlnies or something)? Any reason why we couldn't treat it as a simple maven'd or ant'd project? I expect there probably are. Sods law. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
