On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:30:50 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >To that end, is POI your classic single codebase to single jar? Are
> >
> >
> multiple jars
>
> >there multiple different codebases and targets? Any weirdness to do
> >
> >
> multiple targets same codebase more or less (scratchpad/contrib are
> different). What's it to subversion? We version everything as one.
They're just questions I thought could have bearing on the structural
decision. If it's all just one codebase, then the standard style seems
to be best:
jakarta/
poi/
branches/
tags/
trunk/
I don't have a set of example questions to ask, so half of them were
probably irrelevant :)
Another option would be:
jakarta/
poi/
core/
branches/
tags/
trunk/
contrib/
branches/
tags/
trunk/
scratchpad/
branches/
tags/
trunk/
The major advantage there is that the different codebases are more
independent. Seems that the first is the way to go though.
> >with the binary MS formats that have been a problem in CVS (test files
> >
> >
> no more than any other binary file. (some XLS files) Can Subversion
> not handle bins?
It's fine with bins. I'm searching for ideas on things that could be a
problem, so one idea was that maybe you had to do weird things to have
MS test files stay in MS format when checked out on OS X or something.
Probably should ignore such questions and let testing find them :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
