Am Mittwoch, den 20.04.2005, 23:17 +0530 schrieb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ok, thanks. That makes sense. Do you have a bug he for this? I'll update the
> code with that. In any event i think we should not run known failing tests by
> default, it can hide other breakage. I've been thinking of a way to keep them
> separately in cvs; for now i'll disable them.Quoting Rainer Klute <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>:
Its bug 11744. However, I think we should never leave out any testcases!
Omitting failing testcases contradicts the whole sense of testing.
Instead someone should fix the bugs.
Best regards
Rainer Klute
Rainer Klute IT-Consulting GmbH
Dipl.-Inform.
Rainer Klute E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
K�rner Grund 24 Telefon: +49 172 2324824
D-44143 Dortmund Telefax: +49 231 5349423
Inhibit software patents: http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi
The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
