On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 06:59:32PM +0100, fili wrote:
> fili wrote:
> >>Then your setup "should" work. Maybe you should set REJECTLEVEL to an insane
> >>high value like 100 or so. 
> >
> >Thanks for the information!
> >BTW. is $rejectlevel even used when $dnsbl_checks_only equals true?
> >
> >____________________________________________________________
> >Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
> >
> 
> Hmm, $MAXDNSBLMSG probably isn't the way to tell postfix to execute the 
> 'greylist' restriction class.
> I've tried the following in the policyd-weight.conf:
> 
> $MAXDNSBLMSG = 'rc:greylist';

Correkt

> $MAXDNSBLMSG = 'greylist';

Wrong.
 
> Both lead to this error in the mail.log:
> 
> Jan 13 18:48:34 megatron postfix/policyd-weight[26327]: decided 
> action=greylist; check http://rbls.org/?q=78.144.239.xxx
> Jan 13 18:48:34 megatron postfix/smtpd[30664]: warning: access table 
> inet:127.0.0.1:12525 has entry with lookup table: 
> greylist; check http://rbls.org
> /?q=78.144.239.xxx
> Jan 13 18:48:34 megatron postfix/smtpd[30664]: warning: do not specify lookup 
> tables inside SMTPD access maps
> Jan 13 18:48:34 megatron postfix/smtpd[30664]: warning: define a restriction 
> class and specify its name instead.
> Jan 13 18:48:34 megatron postfix/smtpd[30664]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from 
> unknown[78.144.239.xxx]: 451 4.3.5 Server 
> configuration error; from=<maconhu
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=ESMTP helo=<[78.144.239.xxx]>
> 
> 
> Do you have any idea of what is going wrong?

Make sure you are running 0.1.14.6 by issuing:
/path/to/policyd-weight -v

There was a debian-package called 0.1.14 beta-6 which is a 0.1.14
If that's not the case, use 0.1.14 beta-12 from the official page.

>From the other post, you are right, if you use $dnsbl_checks_only then
$REJECTLEVEL shouldn't come into play.


-- 
    Robert Felber (PGP: 896CF30B)
    Munich, Germany

____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/

Reply via email to