On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:30:50PM +0100, Timo Keßler wrote: > sure, > as far as I've thought it through, the script would be invoked with the > installation directory of > polipo as first argument and an Integer (or string) as a second, which > controls behavior, i.e. in which of 3 standard-locations to put the > edited config : > It would probably be better to improve Polipo's Windows port directly, rather than rely on a script like this. It shouldn't be that hard to get Polipo to detect name servers on Windows. Getting the disk cache to function properly will be harder. > HOWEVER I want to note, that all of this could be avoided and made > unnessisary if the Windows-ports would be accompained by a config-file > or config.sample that simply declares the most nessisary options with > resonable values as follows: > I think these Polipo configuration issues are already covered by Tor's Windows bundles. Is there a reason why a Windows user wishing to use Tor would prefer to download a standalone Polipo package instead?
-- Christopher Davis Mangrin Remailer Admin PGP: 0x0F8DA163 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Polipo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/polipo-users
