[I don't know enough about what happened at the UN meeting to have any
specific reaction (I wasn't at this one). My general feeling is that
improving government cooperation against spammers is likely to do more
good than harm, and the UN is one potential vehicle for it. Then again,
the number of spammers blocked or put out of business by any government
anywhere seems tiny. We don't have time to wait a decade or even five
years for a international anti-spam treaty. Technical countermeasures
including domainkeys/SPF are by far the quickest and most efficient ways
of dealing with spam right now. --Declan]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: UN/spam
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:09:19 -0700
From: Da'ud X Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Oregon Coast News Signal
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hullo Declan,
I'm sure Politech readers would look forward to your take on the UN/spam
story - there were 200+ out there. I chose this one at near-random
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,2964829a28,00.html
Thanks
With peace
dxm
_______________________________________________
Politech mailing list
Archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
Moderated by Declan McCullagh (http://www.mccullagh.org/)
