The surge is a bandaid. We broke Iraq and it won't be easy to fix. The
entire area is at risk.

On Sep 11, 2:51�pm, BlueFlorida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January. � In the
> fair city of �Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January.
> That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn
> country of �Iraq.
> -----------------------------------------
> FDR (DEMOCRAT) led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us;
> Japan did. �From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ... an average of
> 112,500 per year.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�-------------------
> Truman (DEMOCRAT) finished that war and started one in Korea. North
> Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ....
> an average of 18,334 per year.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> John F. Kennedy (DEMOCRAT) started the Vietnam conflict in 1962.
> Vietnam never attacked us.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�-------
> Johnson (DEMOCRAT) turned Vietnam into a quagmire. � From 1965-1975,
> 58,000 lives were lost ... an average of 5,800 per year.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Clinton (DEMOCRAT) went to war in Bosnia without UN or French
> consent. �Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's
> head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has
> attacked us on multiple occasions.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno (DEMOCRAT) to
> take the Branch Davidian compound. �That was a 51-day operation .
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�-------
> It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to
> destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call
> the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Senator Glenn (D-Ohio): �'I served 23 years in the United States
> Marine Corps. �I served through two wars. I flew 149 missions. � � My
> plane was hit by anti-aircraft fire on 12 different occasions. �I was
> in the space program. �It wasn't my checkbook, Howard; it was my life
> on the line. �It was not a nine-to-five job, where I took time off to
> take the daily cash receipts to the bank. I ask you to go with me, as
> I went the other day . .. to a veteran's hospital and look those
> men ... with their mangled bodies ... in the eye, and tell THEM they
> didn't hold a job!
>
> You go with me to the Space Program at NASA and go, as I have gone, to
> the widows and orphans of Ed White, Gus Grissom and Roger Chaffee ..
> and you look those kids in the eye and tell them that their DAD'S
> didn't hold a job.
>
> You go with me on Memorial Day and you stand in Arlington National
> Cemetery, where I have more friends buried than I'd like to remember,
> and you watch those waving flags . You stand there, and you think
> about this nation, and you have the gall to tell ME that those people
> didn't have a job?
> What about Metzenbaum? For those who don't remember During W.W.II,
> Howard Metzenbaum was an attorney representing the Communist Party in
> the USA .
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> I KNOW........."CHANGE"........the subject.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------�----------------------------------
>
> On Sep 11, 1:12 pm, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > No Mark I was ALWAYS against the Invasion, and I was
> > demanding a REAL surge years before Bush to fix the FUBAR
> > he created. It was your Ilk that has consistently gotten it wrong.
>
> > Read the truth about my position on both the Iraq war and the surge.
> > Both positions were posted BEFORE it became popular to have them.
>
> > I give the links Mark, now lets see who has the real balls in this
> > group
>
> > MY POSITION AGAINST THE IRAQ WAR ON FEBRUARY 18,2003!
>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 10:02 PM
> > Subject: One Man's Humble Opinion
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/OpenDebateForum/web/one-mans-humble-op...
>
> > War as a cavalier solution should not be taken lightly. We can conquer
> > Iraq quickly. That should not be a problem. We will kill Saddam. That
> > is a given. Now the dangerous part.
>
> > We will have an occupying army in a US hostile part of the world. We
> > will either be supported or unsupported by our allies. If we are
> > supported the costs to the United States will not be a great and the
> > logistics for war and occupation easier. Without support it will be
> > much more difficult. Our troops will also be exposed to constant
> > danger to ambush. There will be high casualties from this. It will
> > come from many terrorists sources.
>
> > While we are saber rattling it gave the Iraqis time to slip their own
> > terror cells into our country. Don't kid yourselves, they are here.
> > The President gave them plenty of advance warning. So now we have
> > Iraq, Iran, and Al Qaeda terror cells in the US. The seratin found in
> > England was probably distributed through out the NATO countries and
> > the United States. Upon our attack it will probably be released.
>
> > While the war is going on it will be expensive to finance. So we will
> > have to issue Treasuries to pay for the expense. The last treasury
> > auction went badly. We had to offer the notes at discount prices. The
> > yields had to be higher so that the bonds would be bought. During this
> > war interest rates for bonds will rise to finance the war. this will
> > cause interest rates for all loans rise. The cost to use money will
> > rise. The recovery will be postponed. The deficit will be a huge
> > burden for years to come. This is not the same scenario as the last
> > Iraq war.
>
> > This is just the tip of the iceberg. So before you say lets do this
> > and get it over with, just know what the cost of a war could be.
>
> > I am for defending this country against all threats. I just understand
> > what that actually means.
>
> > MY POSITION DEMANDING A REAL SURGE ON AUGUST 28, 2005!
>
> > Sunday, August 28, 2005
> > The Truth about Liberals, The Iraq 'cut and run' and the Useful Bush
> > Idiot lies.
>
> >http://vtsl.blogspot.com/2005/08/truth-about-liberals-iraq-cut-and-ru...
>
> > Sheehan speaks the truth when she says her son died in a war based on
> > lies. That Bush has no honor sending our troops to die based on his
> > lies. No one is saying that the troops dying are dying without honor.
> > Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Al qaida Attacked the US. NO one is
> > calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops out of Iraq. We invaded
> > and caused the chaos in Iraq because of the poor planning of the Bush
> > Administration. We broke, we own it.
>
> > To win this war Two things need to happen. Things that would back fire
> > on the Republicans and the Bush Administration. Two things that would
> > save American and Iraqis lives. We need more troops in Iraq and to
> > supply these troops Bush needs to reinstate the draft.
>
> > Why do we need more troops? To keep the peace in areas AFTER the
> > Marines stomp out the Insurgents in a hot zone. If we do not send in
> > more troops to keep the peace the insurgents merely return once the
> > Marines leave and kill any Iraqis who helped the US. This is not
> > rocket science, but apparently beyond Bush's comprehension. You
> > actually have to be in the military to understand this rational.
>
> > Even with the reinstatement of the draft US troops will remain in
> > force for another Two years in Iraq. It will take that long for the
> > draftees to make a difference, and for the newly trained Iraqis to
> > replace American troops in pacified areas.
>
> > This will only work if the Iraqis KNOW the US plans to withdrawal as
> > Iraqis troops replace them and the time table for this is FIRM.
>
> > This will not happen though, for to do this Bush would have to admit
> > he was wrong in underestimating troop strength in the first place and
> > secondly because a Draft would cause massive protests on US campuses.
> > It will make the Sheehan protest look like a non event. It would also
> > mean the death knell of the Republican's power hold in DC and the
> > epithet to Bush's Administration.
>
> > OK Bush Believers and Useful bush Idiots, now that you know what the
> > LIBERALS REALLY think, what have you to say?
>
> > On Sep 11, 12:48 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > what's the matter lib, lose some good terrorist friends who we killed
> > > in the surge? sorry to see you raghead terrorist buds losing to the
> > > mighty satan? hate to admit you libs were wrong, again?
>
> > > On Sep 11, 11:42 am, VT Sean Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Republicans praise McCain for supporting the Surge,
> > > > I don't get it. Here is why.
>
> > > > September 11, 2008
> > > > Sean Lewis.
>
> > > > The surge has worked, for the moment,
> > > > I still remember the premature celebrations
> > > > of the 'mission accomplished' speech.
>
> > > > My problem with Republicans celebrating the
> > > > success of the surge and bragging about it
> > > > being such a great idea is this....
>
> > > > How do you celebrate the guy who organized
> > > > the bucket brigade, when he was the one who
> > > > set the barn on fire?
>
> > > > Had we not invaded Iraq there would never have
> > > > been a need for the surge.
>
> > > > Just a thought.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to