Gaar, As compared to WHICH bail-out? "Almost" only counts in hand grenades and horseshoes lad.
On Nov 2, 5:10 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually holly... > > Had you bothered to LOOK, you would have found that they are in FACT > very, very similar, if not almost "identical". > > On Nov 2, 7:43 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > gaar, > > > That would only be a viable comparison if the particulars of the > > current "deal" were identical to the particulars and terms of whatever > > "deals in the past" you happen to refer to. Wouldn't it? > > > On Nov 2, 8:58 am, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Such Deals, by the Government, have in fact produced "profits" for the > > > Government, in the past. > > > > On Nov 2, 6:56 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > jgg, > > > > > Bull-fucking-shit, I said no such thing. > > > > What collateral secures the "loan"? Was the stock "purchased" by the > > > > govt. worth the amount of the "loan" at the time the "loan" was made? > > > > > On Nov 1, 12:17 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hollywood after claiming I said Hitler-invented then denying you wrote > > > > > it, little surprises me concerning your logic... It is NOT a giveaway > > > > > to the banks... It is intended to be repay through rebuys of stock by > > > > > the companies that the federal government now own. They were given > > > > > the stock by the companies for the "investment"... So yes dear one, > > > > > once again you seek to hype the story through mis characterization... > > > > > > On Oct 31, 10:34 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > We didn't? You mean it was like a "loan" or something? > > > > > > Care to share with me what the repayment schedule is? Interest paid? > > > > > > What are the late payment penalities? When do the repayments start? > > > > > > What was given as collateral? I'll be fascinated to hear the > > > > > > details. > > > > > > > The mortgage company didn't "give" me the house I live in, so I have > > > > > > all the things listed above. > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 9:11 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Good thing we just didn't "give" it to them then... > > > > > > > > Again, you ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2:10 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > Anyone who would give $700 billion plus to the financial > > > > > > > > instituions > > > > > > > > is a socialist. > > > > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 2:56 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Anyone whbo would use the Tax System to redistribute Wealth > > > > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > > > Socialist. > > > > > > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 12:42 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > > > > > What socialist? There's no socialist running for POTUS. > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 1:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Why does it not surprise me that you would prefer a > > > > > > > > > > > Socialist to an > > > > > > > > > > > American War Hero? > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh that's right... > > > > > > > > > > > > You're not American, and you aren't supposed to have a > > > > > > > > > > > Vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for letting us know this is just your opinion, as > > > > > > > > > > > a non- > > > > > > > > > > > Citizen. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 10:31 am, Weebop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have written and re-written about three replies to > > > > > > > > > > > > your last post > > > > > > > > > > > > and the more I wrote the more I realised that most of > > > > > > > > > > > > what you said > > > > > > > > > > > > makes sense and most of what I was writing was based on > > > > > > > > > > > > my annoyance > > > > > > > > > > > > of your choice of title for your original post more > > > > > > > > > > > > then the facts in > > > > > > > > > > > > hand. And so I concede defeat on many of the points you > > > > > > > > > > > > raise but not > > > > > > > > > > > > all as I still feel that you are arguing from one view > > > > > > > > > > > > point and not > > > > > > > > > > > > the entire picture when it comes to the view Iraqi's > > > > > > > > > > > > have of the > > > > > > > > > > > > coallition force. While many view Iran as a biggist > > > > > > > > > > > > threat I also > > > > > > > > > > > > believe many view the coalition as the biggest threat. > > > > > > > > > > > > And until there > > > > > > > > > > > > are no foriegn troops on their streets (and yes that > > > > > > > > > > > > includes Iranian > > > > > > > > > > > > troops) I don't think we will be able to fully asses > > > > > > > > > > > > the success or > > > > > > > > > > > > failiure of the invasion. I do agree that making Iran > > > > > > > > > > > > stronger in the > > > > > > > > > > > > region is not a good thing but don't believe that is > > > > > > > > > > > > Obama's plan, a > > > > > > > > > > > > man who refuses to discount the possibility of using > > > > > > > > > > > > military force > > > > > > > > > > > > against Iran is hardly backing away and handing them > > > > > > > > > > > > control. He said > > > > > > > > > > > > himself that the "regime is a threat to all of us" > > > > > > > > > > > > which shows he > > > > > > > > > > > > takes the situation seriously. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just to clarify a couple of things before I finish, I > > > > > > > > > > > > am not a US > > > > > > > > > > > > citizen but I have an interest in US politics as I > > > > > > > > > > > > believe it affects > > > > > > > > > > > > the entire world. My belief is that the US foriegn > > > > > > > > > > > > policy has been far > > > > > > > > > > > > too aggressive for a number of years now and there has > > > > > > > > > > > > been a > > > > > > > > > > > > willingness to use military force, or the threat of > > > > > > > > > > > > military force > > > > > > > > > > > > earlier in situations where in the past diplomacy would > > > > > > > > > > > > still have > > > > > > > > > > > > been the preffered option, the obvious example being > > > > > > > > > > > > the invasion of > > > > > > > > > > > > Iraq. With this in mind I think a change is needed and > > > > > > > > > > > > I think Obama > > > > > > > > > > > > is more suited to bring that change then McCain. I > > > > > > > > > > > > don't agree with > > > > > > > > > > > > everything either of the candidates say but as with all > > > > > > > > > > > > politics in a > > > > > > > > > > > > democracy I believe you have to choose the "lesser of > > > > > > > > > > > > two evils" and > > > > > > > > > > > > in my opinion Obama is the preffered candidate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > These are my views and I don't expect you to agree with > > > > > > > > > > > > them but as I > > > > > > > > > > > > don't post on here much these days I thought I'd share > > > > > > > > > > > > them- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
