jgg, Bull-fucking-shit, I said no such thing. What collateral secures the "loan"? Was the stock "purchased" by the govt. worth the amount of the "loan" at the time the "loan" was made?
On Nov 1, 12:17 pm, jgg1000a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hollywood after claiming I said Hitler-invented then denying you wrote > it, little surprises me concerning your logic... It is NOT a giveaway > to the banks... It is intended to be repay through rebuys of stock by > the companies that the federal government now own. They were given > the stock by the companies for the "investment"... So yes dear one, > once again you seek to hype the story through mis characterization... > > On Oct 31, 10:34 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > We didn't? You mean it was like a "loan" or something? > > Care to share with me what the repayment schedule is? Interest paid? > > What are the late payment penalities? When do the repayments start? > > What was given as collateral? I'll be fascinated to hear the details. > > > The mortgage company didn't "give" me the house I live in, so I have > > all the things listed above. > > > On Oct 30, 9:11 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Good thing we just didn't "give" it to them then... > > > > Again, you ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > On Oct 30, 2:10 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > Anyone who would give $700 billion plus to the financial instituions > > > > is a socialist. > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > On Oct 30, 2:56 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Anyone whbo would use the Tax System to redistribute Wealth is a > > > > > Socialist. > > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > > On Oct 30, 12:42 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > > What socialist? There's no socialist running for POTUS. > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 1:18 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Why does it not surprise me that you would prefer a Socialist to > > > > > > > an > > > > > > > American War Hero? > > > > > > > > Oh that's right... > > > > > > > > You're not American, and you aren't supposed to have a Vote. > > > > > > > > Thanks for letting us know this is just your opinion, as a non- > > > > > > > Citizen. > > > > > > > > On Oct 30, 10:31 am, Weebop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have written and re-written about three replies to your last > > > > > > > > post > > > > > > > > and the more I wrote the more I realised that most of what you > > > > > > > > said > > > > > > > > makes sense and most of what I was writing was based on my > > > > > > > > annoyance > > > > > > > > of your choice of title for your original post more then the > > > > > > > > facts in > > > > > > > > hand. And so I concede defeat on many of the points you raise > > > > > > > > but not > > > > > > > > all as I still feel that you are arguing from one view point > > > > > > > > and not > > > > > > > > the entire picture when it comes to the view Iraqi's have of the > > > > > > > > coallition force. While many view Iran as a biggist threat I > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > believe many view the coalition as the biggest threat. And > > > > > > > > until there > > > > > > > > are no foriegn troops on their streets (and yes that includes > > > > > > > > Iranian > > > > > > > > troops) I don't think we will be able to fully asses the > > > > > > > > success or > > > > > > > > failiure of the invasion. I do agree that making Iran stronger > > > > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > region is not a good thing but don't believe that is Obama's > > > > > > > > plan, a > > > > > > > > man who refuses to discount the possibility of using military > > > > > > > > force > > > > > > > > against Iran is hardly backing away and handing them control. > > > > > > > > He said > > > > > > > > himself that the "regime is a threat to all of us" which shows > > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > takes the situation seriously. > > > > > > > > > Just to clarify a couple of things before I finish, I am not a > > > > > > > > US > > > > > > > > citizen but I have an interest in US politics as I believe it > > > > > > > > affects > > > > > > > > the entire world. My belief is that the US foriegn policy has > > > > > > > > been far > > > > > > > > too aggressive for a number of years now and there has been a > > > > > > > > willingness to use military force, or the threat of military > > > > > > > > force > > > > > > > > earlier in situations where in the past diplomacy would still > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > been the preffered option, the obvious example being the > > > > > > > > invasion of > > > > > > > > Iraq. With this in mind I think a change is needed and I think > > > > > > > > Obama > > > > > > > > is more suited to bring that change then McCain. I don't agree > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > everything either of the candidates say but as with all > > > > > > > > politics in a > > > > > > > > democracy I believe you have to choose the "lesser of two > > > > > > > > evils" and > > > > > > > > in my opinion Obama is the preffered candidate. > > > > > > > > > These are my views and I don't expect you to agree with them > > > > > > > > but as I > > > > > > > > don't post on here much these days I thought I'd share them- > > > > > > > > Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
