I like many conservative people aren't against contraception. --- Religious House Republicans Plan To Deny Contraception Access to ... <http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/20/religious-house-republicans-plan-deny-contraception-access-4-6-women.html> www.politicususa.com/.../religious-house-*republicans*-plan-deny- *contraception*-access... <https://www.google.com/#>
1. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:66t7PUmehowJ:www.politicususa.com/2015/06/20/religious-house-republicans-plan-deny-contraception-access-4-6-women.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> 2. <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.politicususa.com/2015/06/20/religious-house-republicans-plan-deny-contraception-access-4-6-women.html+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwggMAA> Jun 20, 2015 - Close-up of birth control pills in two plastic tablet dispenser cases --- ... It is againstevangelical Republicans, a cabal of religious right clergy, ... Republicans look to end 'war on women' with fight over birth control ... <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/11/republicans-women-over-the-counter-birth-control> www.theguardian.com › US News › US Senate The Guardian Jun 11, 2015 - Republicans are promoting over-the-counter birth control to try to fight back againsttheir image as a party waging a “war on women” – but ... The Republican War on Contraception | Mother Jones <http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-war-birth-control-contraception> www.motherjones.com/.../02/*republican*-war-*birth-control*-*contraception* <https://www.google.com/#> 1. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:P4tn3kAFyB0J:www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-war-birth-control-contraception+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> 2. <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-war-birth-control-contraception+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwgsMAI> Mother Jones Feb 9, 2012 - "Contraception is under attack in a way it really wasn't in the past few ... TheRepublican presidential candidates also have come out against ... Senate Republicans return to controversial contraception posture ... <http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republicans-return-controversial-contraception-posture> www.msnbc.com/rachel.../senate-*republicans*-return-controversial- *contraception*-post... <https://www.google.com/#> 1. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QVPa8fBo2qkJ:www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republicans-return-controversial-contraception-posture+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> 2. <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republicans-return-controversial-contraception-posture+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwg0MAM> May 26, 2015 - Last fall, Cory Gardner's Republican Senate campaign in Colorado found ... If anti-contraception employers don't want to cover birth control as ... Ted Cruz Pledges Support For Constitutional Amendment Banning ... <http://www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendment-banning-birth-control/> www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendme... <https://www.google.com/#> 1. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KtZbZ5mEuOAJ:www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendment-banning-birth-control/+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> 2. <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendment-banning-birth-control/+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwg7MAQ> Aug 12, 2015 - Anti-choice extremists don't just want to ban abortion, they want to take away birth control as well, and that's exactly what Ted Cruz has pledged to do. ... Unlike some of the otherRepublican contenders, Ted Cruz has a very ... Politicians Anti Birth Control - Politicians Against Contraception <http://www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/advice/a4845/politicians-anti-birth-control/> www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/.../politicians-*anti*-*birth-control*/ <https://www.google.com/#> 1. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:iIVktRRi4fQJ:www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/advice/a4845/politicians-anti-birth-control/+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> 2. <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/advice/a4845/politicians-anti-birth-control/+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwhCMAU> Cosmopolitan Sep 30, 2013 - When it comes to our uteri, Congress's Republicans seem really confused: They want to restrict abortion on a national scale, but they also don't ... Republicans Birth Control - Huffington Post <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/republicans-birth-control/> www.huffingtonpost.com/news/*republicans*-*birth-control*/ <https://www.google.com/#> 1. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZNXTnseXUkwJ:www.huffingtonpost.com/news/republicans-birth-control/+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> 2. <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.huffingtonpost.com/news/republicans-birth-control/+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwhKMAY> The Huffington Post Senate Dems Ready To 'Fight Back Hard' On Anti-Abortion Bill. HuffingtonPost.com | Laura ... Read More: Cory Gardner Birth Control, Republicans Birth Control, ... On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 12:54:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: > > Plain ole I do you read any of these posts before you reply? I like many > conservative people aren't against contraception. Once again you're being > and this is a term I use quite often where you are concerned "disingenuous". > > On Aug 13, 2016 12:43 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Let's say you are deemed a non viable bundle of cells due to some legal >> justification say your now a burden on the state and you are picked up >> taken to a room tied up and they shoot you in the back of the head. That is >> the literal equivalent of an >> abortion >> --- >> >> >> >> >> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 12:27:39 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>> >>> Brian does term pro choice as generic as it is ease your sensibilities . >>> Let's say you are deemed a non viable bundle of cells due to some legal >>> justification say your now a burden on the state and you are picked up >>> taken to a room tied up and they shoot you in the back of the head. That is >>> the literal equivalent of an >>> abortion. Is that murder? >>> >>> On Aug 13, 2016 12:07 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> When it comes to Planned Parenthood it's not about "choice", or they'd >>>> offer adoption services, and they don't. It's about abortion and only >>>> abortion when a pregnant woman goes there. >>>> >>>> As for your other question, I'm not remotely religious. I do, however, >>>> have a background in healthcare and grasp that a fetus is not a tumor or >>>> some sort of cancer - it's a human life. That is why I have no problem >>>> whatsoever with limiting abortions to the first trimester - like most >>>> civilized nations do. The pro-abortion democrats in America, however, >>>> shriek to the high heavens when lawmakers try to legislate even that. They >>>> want the right to abort a baby up to and including the day it's freaking >>>> due - and that, IMO, is murder once the fetus would be viable outside the >>>> mother's womb. >>>> >>>> For me it's not religion. it's science. >>>> >>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 12:39:45 PM UTC-4, brine wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I prefer the term Pro-Choice ... after all it IS a choice and no >>>>> amount of hand wringing and finger pointing will change that ... if you >>>>> have a deep religious objection to abortion, that is fine ... in that >>>>> scenario, the person will be judged for their decision by god when she >>>>> dies!!! Here's a question, if my religious beliefs are not the same as >>>>> yours, why must I follow your religion's rules??? >>>>> >>>>> There is a clinic about a mile from my house that I pass on the >>>>> weekends when i go to Wegmans ... there is a crowd of people prancing >>>>> with >>>>> crosses and sandwich boards denouncing the place, I see no adopted >>>>> children >>>>> along side them!!! >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 12:34 PM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I know, right? Even the nasty women at Planned Parenthood are too >>>>>> cowardly to call themselves what they are - pro-abortion. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 10:50:11 AM UTC-4, fed up wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> They can't call it what it is or else it would expose their agenda >>>>>>> which they know is morally reprehensible. They have to follow the >>>>>>> typical >>>>>>> liberal MO of obfuscate, inveigle and mislead. Remember their audience >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> the same one Gruber was talking about, those 47 percent of hopelessly >>>>>>> stupid Americans that will fall for anything and vote for people like >>>>>>> Obummer or the Hildebeast. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Droid* >>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2016 10:39 AM, 'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then call it what it is - abortion freedom. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The phrase "reproductive freedom" implies one's right to reproduce. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 8:40:14 AM UTC-4, plainolamerican >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What? Are you claiming women in America have some sort of >>>>>>> restriction on their right to reproduce? >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> no, on their ability to abort a fetus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 21 Abortion Clinics Have Closed in Texas in Three Years Under Key ... >>>>>>> <http://www.lifenews.com/2016/06/24/21-abortion-clinics-have-closed-in-texas-in-three-years-under-key-pro-life-law/> >>>>>>> www.lifenews.com/.../21-*abortion*-*clinics*-have-*closed* >>>>>>> -in-texas-in-three... >>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Wiqeefm2fHUJ:www.lifenews.com/2016/06/24/21-abortion-clinics-have-closed-in-texas-in-three-years-under-key-pro-life-law/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> LifeNews.com >>>>>>> Jun 24, 2016 - Since a portion of the law went into effect, 21 abortion >>>>>>> clinics closed in ... limits in the past, including the federal ban >>>>>>> on partial-birth abortion. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeezus, Plainol, >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> you can just call me plainol. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> you need to get out more. You're puking out the kind of nutty shit >>>>>>> only seen on dark internet holes filled with liberal moonbats. >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> it would suck to be an ignorant conservative xian like you, who >>>>>>> would restrict a women's decision to abort a fetus. >>>>>>> here .. educate yourself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://prochoice.org/education-and-advocacy/about-abortion/history-of-abortion/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Supreme Court Reopens Clinics Closed By Anti-Abortion Law ... >>>>>>> <https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-reopens-clinics-closed-by-anti-abortion-law-34122cbab5d0> >>>>>>> https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-reopens-*clinics*-*closed* >>>>>>> -by-anti-... >>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:FpuaDQQYMCEJ:https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-reopens-clinics-closed-by-anti-abortion-law-34122cbab5d0+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ThinkProgress >>>>>>> Supreme Court Reopens Clinics Closed By Anti-Abortion Law ... >>>>>>> reopen after they were closed due to a recent decision by a >>>>>>> conservative federal appeals court. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 5:18:32 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What? Are you claiming women in America have some sort of >>>>>>> restriction on their right to reproduce? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jeezus, Plainol, you need to get out more. You're puking out the >>>>>>> kind of nutty shit only seen on dark internet holes filled with liberal >>>>>>> moonbats. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 5:13:48 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> the war on women >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> while there's been a lot of improvements, the reproductive rights of >>>>>>> women are still under attack. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Friday, August 12, 2016 at 3:53:52 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perplexed excuse the term but I think they shot their load at the >>>>>>> war on women >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2016 2:48 PM, "'Perplexed' via PoliticalForum" < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1. Hillary Clinton is about as far from being a "girl" as you can >>>>>>> get. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2. Elizabeth Warren shows what a blithering idiot she is by claiming >>>>>>> Trump made "death threats". That's as ignorant as these college-age >>>>>>> lunatics claiming words are "violence". >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Personally I think this very sort of ridiculous spastic >>>>>>> emotobabbling we're seeing from the left over every single thing Trump >>>>>>> says >>>>>>> will backfire. More and more Americans will see the libtards for the >>>>>>> abject >>>>>>> morons they truly are. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 12:24:45 AM UTC-4, plainolamerican >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Elizabeth Warren just summed up the reaction many people are having: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Elizabeth Warren ✔ @elizabethforma >>>>>>> >>>>>>> .@realDonaldTrump makes death threats because he's a pathetic coward >>>>>>> who can’t handle the fact that he’s losing to a girl. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 5:51 PM - 9 Aug 2016 >>>>>>> 40,034 40,034 Retweets 69,587 69,587 likes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>>>> >>>>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>>>> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> brine >>>>> http://brineb.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> -- >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >> -- >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >> >> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "PoliticalForum" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
