They admitted it on camera On Aug 13, 2016 2:40 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> wrote:
> and PP was cleared of charges the mishandled or sold fetal tissue. > > On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 2:30:47 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >> >> The charges were dropped >> >> On Aug 13, 2016 2:29 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> the disgusting evidence of them selling body parts. >>> --- >>> the grand jury cleared Planned Parenthood of misusing fetal tissue and >>> instead indicted Merritt and Daleiden, who has said he was working >>> undercover as a journalist to expose illegalities in the handling of fetal >>> tissue. >>> >>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 2:06:29 PM UTC-5, Perplexed wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> There is something to be said about Republicans and their never-change >>>> direction agenda that may be related to their “conservative” affliction. >>>> For the past five years one of the primary goals of Republicans they just >>>> cannot abandon is fulfilling the demands of the United States Conference of >>>> Catholic Bishops to ban contraception use in America. It was not enough >>>> that the Papal-5 on the Supreme Court ruled that religious employers could >>>> restrict their employees’ use of birth control, so now Republicans have >>>> resorted to their annual attempt to eliminate the Title X program that >>>> provides family planning services, including contraceptives, to roughly 4.6 >>>> million impoverished women. As usual, since Republicans in the House >>>> control the nation’s purse strings, they are using the 2016 budget to >>>> eliminate all funding for Title X and finally end the program that has been >>>> one of their cherished goals since taking control of the House in 2011. >>>> --------- >>>> >>>> Let's examine the first paragraph of your link to see if you even know >>>> just what kind of idiotic BS it is you are citing here. >>>> >>>> First, they state that the GOP is trying to ban contraception. Can you >>>> show me a single bill passed by republicans in either house that attempted >>>> to do so? How about one even voted upon that attempted to do so? Can't wait >>>> to see what you come up with. >>>> >>>> Second, the next sentence has TWO pieces of horse shit in it: >>>> >>>> *It was not enough that the Papal-5 on the Supreme Court ruled that >>>> religious employers could restrict their employees’ use of birth control, >>>> so now Republicans have resorted to their annual attempt to eliminate the >>>> Title X program that provides family planning services, including >>>> contraceptives, to roughly 4.6 million impoverished women.* >>>> >>>> The Hobby Lobby decision determined that religious employers couldn't >>>> be forced to provide or pay for contraception that Obamacare mandated. The >>>> fact is, some work by preventing implantation and that is considered a form >>>> of abortion for many people. The fact is, it's unconstitutional for the >>>> federal government to interfere in the right of US citizens' religious >>>> freedom. To state that the decision "ruled that religious employers could >>>> restrict their employees' use of birth control" is a BLATANT LIE. >>>> >>>> It then says that republicans have "resorted to their annual attempt to >>>> eliminate the Title X program". Again, can you show me a bill that was >>>> either passed or voted on that did this? Because I've read the bills and >>>> they SPECIFICALLY spelled out that between the county and public health >>>> clinics that are in the US to provide access to contraception, there are >>>> plenty of places women can obtain such services without having to rely on >>>> Planned Parenthood - which provides abortions. >>>> >>>> AGAIN, I think it's plainly idiotic for republicans to not want to fund >>>> anywhere else women want to go to avoid pregnancy or to terminate an >>>> unwanted one. But I do understand why they have been trying to strip PP of >>>> funding recently with all the disgusting evidence of them selling body >>>> parts. Let those GD Hollywood liberals fund Planed Parenthood. Or, we're >>>> continually hearing that liberals are far more educated, so let the PhDs >>>> fund it. But don't expect taxpayers who are strongly opposed to abortion >>>> (on religious grounds especially) to be forced to subsidize an organization >>>> that not only provides abortions, but sells body parts for cash as well. >>>> >>>> I don't view it as remotely "conservative" to think it makes sense for >>>> the government to force a woman who doesn't want to be a mother to be one, >>>> and then to force the taxpayers to spend the $250K it takes to get that >>>> child to age 18. In fact, it's anti-conservative. It's something religious >>>> groups or other groups can or should be working on - NOT legislators at any >>>> level. >>>> >>>> But to lie (or to cite sites that lie) about it is pathetic. >>>> >>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 2:11:47 PM UTC-4, plainolamerican wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I like many conservative people aren't against contraception. >>>>> --- >>>>> Religious House Republicans Plan To Deny Contraception Access to ... >>>>> <http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/20/religious-house-republicans-plan-deny-contraception-access-4-6-women.html> >>>>> www.politicususa.com/.../religious-house-*republicans*-plan-deny- >>>>> *contraception*-access... >>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:66t7PUmehowJ:www.politicususa.com/2015/06/20/religious-house-republicans-plan-deny-contraception-access-4-6-women.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.politicususa.com/2015/06/20/religious-house-republicans-plan-deny-contraception-access-4-6-women.html+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwggMAA> >>>>> >>>>> Jun 20, 2015 - Close-up of birth control pills in two plastic tablet >>>>> dispenser cases --- ... It is againstevangelical Republicans, a cabal >>>>> of religious right clergy, ... >>>>> Republicans look to end 'war on women' with fight over birth control >>>>> ... >>>>> <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/11/republicans-women-over-the-counter-birth-control> >>>>> www.theguardian.com › US News › US Senate >>>>> The Guardian >>>>> Jun 11, 2015 - Republicans are promoting over-the-counter birth >>>>> control to try to fight back againsttheir image as a party waging a >>>>> “war on women” – but ... >>>>> The Republican War on Contraception | Mother Jones >>>>> <http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-war-birth-control-contraception> >>>>> www.motherjones.com/.../02/*republican*-war-*birth-control*- >>>>> *contraception* >>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:P4tn3kAFyB0J:www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-war-birth-control-contraception+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/02/republican-war-birth-control-contraception+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwgsMAI> >>>>> >>>>> Mother Jones >>>>> Feb 9, 2012 - "Contraception is under attack in a way it really >>>>> wasn't in the past few ... TheRepublican presidential candidates also >>>>> have come out against ... >>>>> Senate Republicans return to controversial contraception posture ... >>>>> <http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republicans-return-controversial-contraception-posture> >>>>> www.msnbc.com/rachel.../senate-*republicans*-return-controversial- >>>>> *contraception*-post... >>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:QVPa8fBo2qkJ:www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republicans-return-controversial-contraception-posture+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/senate-republicans-return-controversial-contraception-posture+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwg0MAM> >>>>> >>>>> May 26, 2015 - Last fall, Cory Gardner's Republican Senate campaign >>>>> in Colorado found ... If anti-contraception employers don't want to >>>>> cover birth control as ... >>>>> Ted Cruz Pledges Support For Constitutional Amendment Banning ... >>>>> <http://www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendment-banning-birth-control/> >>>>> www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-con >>>>> stitutional-amendme... >>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:KtZbZ5mEuOAJ:www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendment-banning-birth-control/+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.forwardprogressives.com/ted-cruz-pledges-support-for-constitutional-amendment-banning-birth-control/+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwg7MAQ> >>>>> >>>>> Aug 12, 2015 - Anti-choice extremists don't just want to ban >>>>> abortion, they want to take away birth control as well, and that's >>>>> exactly what Ted Cruz has pledged to do. ... Unlike some of the other >>>>> Republican contenders, Ted Cruz has a very ... >>>>> Politicians Anti Birth Control - Politicians Against Contraception >>>>> <http://www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/advice/a4845/politicians-anti-birth-control/> >>>>> www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/.../politicians-*anti*- >>>>> *birth-control*/ >>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:iIVktRRi4fQJ:www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/advice/a4845/politicians-anti-birth-control/+&cd=6&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/advice/a4845/politicians-anti-birth-control/+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwhCMAU> >>>>> >>>>> Cosmopolitan >>>>> Sep 30, 2013 - When it comes to our uteri, Congress's Republicans seem >>>>> really confused: They want to restrict abortion on a national scale, but >>>>> they also don't ... >>>>> Republicans Birth Control - Huffington Post >>>>> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/republicans-birth-control/> >>>>> www.huffingtonpost.com/news/*republicans*-*birth-control*/ >>>>> <https://www.google.com/#> >>>>> >>>>> 1. >>>>> >>>>> <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ZNXTnseXUkwJ:www.huffingtonpost.com/news/republicans-birth-control/+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us> >>>>> 2. >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.google.com/search?biw=1517&bih=665&q=related:www.huffingtonpost.com/news/republicans-birth-control/+republicans+against+contraception&tbo=1&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjQ1snU_r7OAhWGOCYKHapNC7QQHwhKMAY> >>>>> >>>>> The Huffington Post >>>>> Senate Dems Ready To 'Fight Back Hard' On Anti-Abortion Bill. >>>>> HuffingtonPost.com | Laura ... Read More: Cory Gardner Birth Control, >>>>> Republicans >>>>> Birth Control, ... >>>>> >>>>> On Saturday, August 13, 2016 at 12:54:03 PM UTC-5, gtheist957 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Plain ole I do you read any of these posts before you reply? I like >>>>>> many conservative people aren't against contraception. Once again you're >>>>>> being and this is a term I use quite often where you are concerned >>>>>> "disingenuous". >>>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 13, 2016 12:43 PM, "plainolamerican" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Let's say you are deemed a non viable bundle of cells due to some >>>>>>> legal justification say your now a burden on the state and you are >>>>>>> picked >>>>>>> up taken to a room tied up and they shoot you in the back of the head. >>>>>>> That >>>>>>> is the literal equivalent of an >>>>>>> abortion >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> <img src="https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/aIsGD2E_ >>>>>>> wH3CTp7OdLPEX9bmORLB_1eJCVQSYReOM >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>> -- >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. >>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum >>> >>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more. >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
