Sucks to have some whiny bitch censoring your shit, eh Ewen?  Particularly 
when it's so hit or miss depending on whether he's having his period at 
that very moment.

On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 4:05:48 AM UTC-6, euwe wrote:
>
> I reposted the first paragraph only (up to "and which are not?") and it 
> was also deleted as spam.
>
> On Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 2:04:06 AM UTC-8, euwe wrote:
>>
>> the topic:
>>
>> http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/30/coulter-how-trump-could-ruin-his-presidency/
>>
>> my reply:
>>
>> But if he breaks a *major* campaign promise, his supporters will turn on 
>> him with a blind ferocity, dwarfing their rage toward Jeb! because Trump’s 
>> is the more exquisite con. He will have duped them. And he will never, 
>> ever, ever get them back.
>> ------------
>> That's a little Gothic baroque there, seems to me, especially in light of 
>> the mincing around the word "promise." Haven't we already begun bracing for 
>> what we already know are broken promises by giving permission for Trump to 
>> define which promises are major and which are not?
>>
>> Isn't it business as usual? Haven't we always found ourselves willingly 
>> yoked by the tyranny of low expectations? Reagan's rule - don't criticize 
>> our own - the opposition will do it for us.
>>
>> Only in the case of Trump, not only have we accepted the old politicians 
>> trick, "read my lips," on a sliding scale of meaning, but added permission 
>> to redefine the new red-meat phrases that energized the base as 'sarcasm,' 
>> 'literary license,' and 'hyperbole'.
>>
>> Ann, if you go ballistic about "broken promises," you'll be facing the 
>> populist movement we've based all our hopes on, alone.. Do I have to remind 
>> you what awaits you on that road?
>>
>> First, you'll be "crazy Ann" - that "disgusting person," who he never 
>> thought was a very good writer. Never read your books. Shortly followed by 
>> character assassination - every day will be a bad hair day - bad lighting 
>> in the studio, or in a late night, grainy paparazzi photo .. sunken eye 
>> sockets.. Rosie was a fat pig.. you'll be a skinny witch, maybe with a sly 
>> sniff into the microphone for emphasis. Perhaps Trump will muse aloud 
>> during a press conference without naming you, whether an Adam's apple is a 
>> dead give-away for... well, you know.
>>
>> and then there's twitter.
>>
>> Oh, your friends at Fox will help you out at first, give you some 
>> air-time like a two-headed snake - the sensation of the hour, poked and 
>> prodded like a specimen in a jar.. will Hannity abandon Trump, that he 
>> single handedly elected, for your unique commentary, book tours and biting 
>> insights?
>>
>> If your list of "major" promises disagrees with his, I suggest you parrot 
>> his exact phrases describing his rationalizations - as all the others who 
>> depend on populism for their celebrity, and continued income, will.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to politicalforum+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to