Yes holly, and that is ALL you asked for... Had you been able to address ANY of his argument, and then made that point, it would have not been as I said.
That FACT that is ALL you did makes it what it is. Not my fault you Idiots do such things, I simply point them out. On Nov 16, 12:13 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gaar, > > What did I say "against the man"? I asked what credientials he had > that would make him "tops" in his field. > I have to show his theory is flawed BEFORE I dare ask what his > credentials are? Ridiculous! > I did in fact make no rebuttal whatsoever of his theory. I asked YOU > "who says he's tops" in his field. Your getting more and more > ridiculous lad. > > On Nov 16, 1:14 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Asked and answered. > > > Care to discuss anything he has said, or just discuss him? > > > You understand that Ad Hominem is Latin for "against the man", right? > > > So when you concentrate your argument "against the man" that is > > presenting it, you are in fact commiting an Ad Hominem attack. > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > Now, had you questioned his "Theory" and SHOWN it to be flawed in a > > general psychiatrive sense, then it would be well and good to question > > his credentioals. When you make that your ONLY REBUTTAL, it is in > > FACT an Ad Hominem Attack. > > > On Nov 16, 11:10 am, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > No, saying that his momma is a ho or that he is an ignorant ass is a > > > personal attack. Asking for someone's credentials when it is claimed > > > that they are a "top psychiatrist" and make sweeping generalizations > > > about huge portions of the population is in no way an attack. > > > Inquiring minds want to know. > > > > On Nov 16, 2:05 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, holly... > > > > > When you ignore his argument to only try to discuss him, you are in > > > > fact commiting an Ad Hominem attack. > > > > > Your ignorance on the matter notwithstanding. > > > > > On Nov 16, 11:00 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Gaar, > > > > > > Your getting as hyper-sensitive as a pre-teen little girl. Asking for > > > > > a man's credentials is an ATTACK? Ain't you the delicate one? > > > > > Get real lad. Anyone can play war-of-the-experts. > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:43 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 7:43 am, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > WHO says Dr. Rossiter is a "top psychiatrist"? > > > > > > > Just like a Loony Liberal. > > > > > > > Instead of addressing ANYTHING the man asserts, attack him > > > > > > personally > > > > > > instead. > > > > > > > Same old shit, just another day with these Loony Liberals. > > > > > > > No surprise there.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
