On Nov 16, 12:44 pm, OMS-II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You attacking me with your quotation marks comes close to being and ad- > hominem attack, Gaar....much closer than anyone else on this board has > done on this thread.
Not so... I in FACT made a point that I believe SHOWED why I then made that other point. Interesting that you seem to believe an insulkt constitutes an Ad Hominem, when in fact it is the "basis" of the argument that does such a thing. If you "base" your argument strictly against the person, then you are commiting an Ad Hominem Attack. If you point out the reasoning behind your "insult", in clear concise terms, you are simply Editorializing aftyer making your case. There is a difference that anyone familiar with formal Debate can easily identify. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
