No, it is more than my opinion. Any sane, rational person would see that Hollywood asking for the psychiatrist's credentials is NOT an ad hominem attack.
On Nov 16, 4:27�pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No wncs, you posted your OPINION, as a Moderator... > > No surprise there, I guess. > > On Nov 16, 1:25�pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I am a moderator on this board, that's what I was doing posting as a > > moderator. Tell me again what "powers" I used? At no time did I > > threaten anyone with moderation or anything of the sort. No action was > > taken and no threat of action was mentioned. > > > On Nov 16, 4:22 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any time you assert youself as a Moderator, and not just a poster, you > > > are in fact using the powers of Moderation. > > > > By your own assertion, had you not been "Moderating" you wouldn't have > > > said anything, right? > > > > So you tell me, what were you doing posting here as a Moderator? > > > > On Nov 16, 1:20 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What powers did I use? Did I threaten anyone or place them on > > > > moderation? Nope. I clarified a false accusation so that it couldn't > > > > be used against a poster in the future. > > > > So, what "powers" are you talking about? > > > > > On Nov 16, 4:19 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes. > > > > > > Neither of us have ever used these powers for what YOU just did. > > > > > > I agree, that is very, very telling indeed. > > > > > > Thanks for pointing it out. > > > > > > On Nov 16, 1:17 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Only since the election, which is very, very telling. > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 4:16 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Again, you and I have very different views about how the powers of > > > > > > > Moderation should be used here. > > > > > > > > Capiche? > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 1:13 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > *I* felt it necessary as a moderator to prevent such an > > > > > > > > accusation > > > > > > > > from being used against Hollywood in the future. > > > > > > > > Capiche? > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 4:09 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > That as nothing to do with the Rules? > > > > > > > > > > I do such things all the time, but NEVER as a Moderator. > > > > > > > > > > I only assert myself here as a Moderator when the Rules have > > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > broken and that needs to be addressed. > > > > > > > > > > We obviously see the role of Moderator much differently. > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 1:05 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I would say that it is okay for you as a moderator to > > > > > > > > > > clarify if a > > > > > > > > > > false accusation was made against a poster, whether you > > > > > > > > > > agree with > > > > > > > > > > them or not. > > > > > > > > > > The fact that you are the only one here who thinks that > > > > > > > > > > Hollywood made > > > > > > > > > > an ad hominem attack speaks volumes. > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 3:59 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > And again, since you didn't address it the first time... > > > > > > > > > > > > "So I guess it is ok, as a Moderator, for me to "side" > > > > > > > > > > > with those I > > > > > > > > > > > support, even if I don't make an argument for myself, and > > > > > > > > > > > no Rules > > > > > > > > > > > were broken?!?!?!? > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that your position? " > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like an answer to that question, please. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:56 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was indeed false. Hollywood did not make an > > > > > > > > > > > > adhominem attack, no > > > > > > > > > > > > matter how much you would like to assert that he did. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 3:54 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It was not false, as I have SHOWN, and you can only > > > > > > > > > > > > > SAY... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Imagine that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So I guess it is ok, as a Moderator, for me to "side" > > > > > > > > > > > > > with those I > > > > > > > > > > > > > support, even if I don't make an argument for myself, > > > > > > > > > > > > > and no Rules > > > > > > > > > > > > > were broken?!?!?!? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is that your position? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:46 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A false accusation was made against a poster, and I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have seen such > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accusations resurface for other posters in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > past. My reason for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > joining this thread was to set the record straight > > > > > > > > > > > > > > about Holly, so > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that it doesn't come back to haunt him later. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 3:40 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So it is ok, with you, if I insert myself, as a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Moderator, whenever I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > believe someone "may" be taken out of context, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and assert my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Moderation" to help one side of a discussion > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > against another? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is ok with you? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:37 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've already answered that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 3:33 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then why insert yourself as a Moderator? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:23 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please show where I stated that rules were > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > broken. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll wait here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 3:22 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are the only one who seems to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > asserting that any Rules were > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > broken. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anyone wonder why? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That way, you can make your comments > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > without having to defend them in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the context of the discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 12:02 pm, wncs <[EMAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I stepped in as a moderator to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make an observation. At no time > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > did I assert moderation or threaten > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyone with any action. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2:59 pm, wncs <[EMAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I stepped in because an accusation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > was made against a poster that was > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > blatantly untrue. I have seen before > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how these things get out of hand. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 2:55 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 16, 11:51 am, wncs <[EMAIL > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I fully understand the rules of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this forum, just making sure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > else does too. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I made no Moderation type > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > statements here myself, you are the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > only one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to do so... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So the question becomes: Just who > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does and who does not understand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Rules? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why would you feel the need to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > insert yourself as a Moderator here, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when no one was questioning > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anything about the Rules? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You say you had no desire to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > discuss the Topic, and you only > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chimed in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a Moderator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to know why?- Hide > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
