I see you know no more about government than you do about anything else. Try reading past newspapers about the votes in the Senate and the House about the bailout bill and who opposed it. Nancy and Harry really screwed us this time. And it looks as if they intend to continue on down the road of disaster they have mapped out for us.
On Jan 1, 3:03 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > Zeb, > > Sorry, this stinky baby is Bush's. Just deal with it. > > On Jan 1, 12:46 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Bush Bailout? LOL! This money was allocated and authorized by a > > Democrat congress. Nancy and Harry are the authors of this disaster. > > > On Jan 1, 10:01 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > mark, > > > > You mean their is still a corporation that has not yet gotten a piece > > > of the Bush Bail-Out? > > > > On Jan 1, 6:03 am, Ohio mark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > the times will run to the dems and demand their payback for being the > > > > propaganda wing for them. maybe some pleading, some begging, a little > > > > blackmail. they will get their bailout too. > > > > > On Jan 1, 12:30 am, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Zeb, > > > > > > My, but you're certainly being an exceptionally nasty little cock- > > > > > sucker tonight. You have something against the Constituion or > > > > > something? > > > > > > On Dec 31, 9:43 pm, Zebnick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > We are not putting a boot on the throat of the Iraqi people the way > > > > > > Saddam did, you filthy piece of stinking dog shit. As a toast to the > > > > > > new year, drink some Drano, traitor. > > > > > > > On Dec 31, 9:52 pm, lef <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Of course you can pacify Iraq by using excessive force. Saddam > > > > > > > did it > > > > > > > for decades. > > > > > > > > On 31 Dec 2008, 21:28, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Amazing, and dishonest... One does not have to wonder why > > > > > > > > Urban Myths > > > > > > > > are seen as facts when the paper of record refuses to > > > > > > > > acknowledge > > > > > > > > simple basic facts... > > > > > > > > >http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2008/12/and-a-happy-new.html > > > > > > > > > >>>We expect the Times to continue to promote the notion that > > > > > > > > >>>withdrawals can work. The appealing wrinkle is that now, > > > > > > > > >>>withdrawals are appropriate because the areas are pacified; > > > > > > > > >>>the old theme had been that withdrawals were necessary > > > > > > > > >>>because to stand and fight was a waste of lives and effort. > > > > > > > > > Neither this article nor the September piece mention Bush or > > > > > > > > use the > > > > > > > > word "surge". Whatever.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
