It isn't even the History Channel. Its a Washington state based blog run by a bunch of "educators."
On Jan 14, 11:03 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > History Channel????? > > Bush is still current events. > > Wonder what the Hostory Channel wil say in 50 years when Bush is > history. > > The Loons can't even pcae Clinton's achievements above Bush - to say > nothing of Jimmy Carter. > > The Loons don't even try. > > On Jan 14, 10:54 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Milk in your grits? That's just wrong, mikey! Butter, even cheese, > > okay, but milk? > > > It's interesting. Even most of those who voted for Bush will no longer > > defend him. > > > On Jan 14, 10:20 am, "florida mike !" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > yeah i know i just figured i would brighten lower case mark and > > > travis's day by giving them something to yawn at . :o} > > > hey ! just for grins and giggles i asked for a class of milk to put in > > > my grits yesterday at the local dinner . all i got was some funny > > > looks and no milk ! > > > On Jan 14, 10:10 am, wncs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > No surprise there. > > > > > On Jan 14, 9:18 am, "florida mike !" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > 'History News Network' rated Bush the worst president in the > > > > > nation's > > > > > historyhttp://www.buzzflash.net/story.php?id=86618 > > > > > Bush leaves office next Tuesday with the lowest sustained approval > > > > > ratings of any modern president. With the exception of hard-line neo- > > > > > conservatives and other far-right hawks who ruled the roost in Bush's > > > > > first term, the overwhelming consensus of veteran analysts here is > > > > > that his "global war on terror" -- for which he is likely to be most > > > > > remembered -- has inflicted unprecedented and possibly permanent > > > > > damage on Washington's image abroad. The latter problem may not > > > > > matter > > > > > to those who, like Vice President Dick Cheney and the "neo-cons", > > > > > have > > > > > long disdained diplomacy and other forms of "soft power". But the > > > > > unexpected difficulties confronted by U.S. military forces in > > > > > Afghanistan and Iraq -- as well as the transparent failure of "hard > > > > > power" to have the desired effect in other "terror-war" theatres, > > > > > such > > > > > as Somalia and Pakistan (or Lebanon, in Israel's case) -- have > > > > > exposed > > > > > the limits of a U.S.-dominated "unipolar world", and the ability of > > > > > the U.S. armed forces to enforce it on their own.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
