No the issue is about pragmatic reality VS intellectual ideology
one is flexible one is inflexible. One works, one fails.

On Mar 13, 10:37 am, jgg1000a <[email protected]> wrote:
> and Intellectual they both are NOT
>
> http://the-undercurrent.com/paper/obama-the-intellectual/
>
> >>> In action, Obama is clearly not an intellectual. He, like Bush and other 
> >>> politicians, is a pragmatist—the exact opposite of an intellectual. Issue 
> >>> after issue, including taxes, the Iraq war, and the environment, reveals 
> >>> that Obama has made decisions, not with reference to firm principles 
> >>> derived from a careful and scholarly investigation of the facts, but by 
> >>> trying to find some middle ground in a landscape of competing opinions.
>
> What is different about Obama is that he self-consciously knows and
> proclaims his approach. But what’s so significant about that, if the
> approach itself is anti-intellectual? Obama openly embraces the view
> that it is impossible to use the intellect to ascertain the right way
> to handle the war or deal with the economy, and so he adopts the tack
> of just trying things and seeing what happens. Consider Obama’s claim
> that his “core economic theory is pragmatism, figuring out what
> works” (“Obamanomics,” NYT, 8/20/08). How is this any different from
> prior, allegedly non-intellectual politicians, other than that those
> politicians didn’t happen to be explicit about their methodology?
>
> However much Obama seems to sport the trappings of an intellectual—and
> clearly he does—in practice, his policy consists in shooting from the
> hip, making short-range decisions without adherence to any firm set of
> guiding convictions.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to