Perfect solution:  Elect them to one six-year term and at the end of that
shoot them.

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:37 AM, RichardForbes <[email protected]
> wrote:

>
> Hollywood and Travis -
>
> I just caught your discussion about term limits.  I have long opposed
> such measures more on principle than political ideology.  I was glad
> to see the Republicans recommend term limits for their House members
> back in the 1990s, but many failed to follow through with their
> promise.  We are at a point where you cannot expect self-regulation to
> work and the people seem unwilling or unable to address the matter at
> the ballot box.  However, ther is no way to make this change without
> assistance from the House and Senate and they have no intention of
> voluntarily limiting themselves with stipulated term limits.  While I
> am trending toward a belief that this is a necessary change to correct
> the problems in DC, I am doubtful that we can expect any assistance
> from out esteemed re-elected representatives and those not yet elected
> will not turn over fast enough to make a difference.  If you have a
> solution to this gridlock, I would love to hear it.
>
> On Jul 24, 11:35 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Travis,
> >
> > That would just be a good start. We also need to do something about
> > campaign financing reform and recall voting. It needs to be easier to
> > rid of these bums.
> >
> > On Jul 24, 10:39 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > This shit will never change until we get term limits on those bastards.
> >
> > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Hollywood <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > Richard,
> >
> > > > Yeah, just checked it less than 10 minutes ago, why?
> > > > We occassionaly agree, can't say it's on a regular basis.
> >
> > > > On Jul 24, 9:29 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]>
> > > >  wrote:
> > > > > I know.  I was agreeing with you.
> >
> > > > > Did you ever think you would hear that?
> >
> > > > > BTW, do you ever check your email?
> >
> > > > > On Jul 24, 9:27 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > Richard,
> >
> > > > > > Well, duuuuuuuh..... WTF do you think I've been talking about?
> >
> > > > > > On Jul 24, 9:01 pm, RichardForbes <[email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > You betcha.  The "no old fogies left behind" bill is going to
> wind up
> > > > > > > costing us far more than Iraq.  The bottom line is that most
> > > > > > > politicians have no incentive not to spend money .... it is not
> their
> > > > > > > money that is on the line.  Our whole system is a real mess.
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 24, 8:53 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Richard,
> >
> > > > > > > > Such is life. We will also be paying for Bush decisions for
> decades
> > > > to
> > > > > > > > come. Obe way or another we all pay for a long time for damn
> near
> > > > > > > > every decision made by every President we ever had. Grow some
> > > > cajones
> > > > > > > > people, this has been going on for a loooooong time.
> >
> > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 8:49 pm, RichardForbes <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > Hollywood, unfortunately, Bush is quickly looking like a
> better
> > > > > > > > > option.  Obama is in way over his head and we are all going
> to
> > > > pay the
> > > > > > > > > price of this "not ready for prime time player".
> >
> > > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 7:56 pm, Hollywood <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > Travis,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > At least we are rid of that idiot Bush.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 7:54 pm, Travis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > Very true, Holly.  Just look at how many idiots voted
> for
> > > > obama.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Hollywood <
> > > > [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Richard,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately stupidity tends to have consequences.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 7:23 pm, RichardForbes <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Hollywood, unfortunately, many younger folks do not
> seem
> > > > to understand
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that fact.  Even worse is that his entertainment is
> more
> > > > honest than
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the actual coverage by any of the Big Three.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 7:37 pm, Hollywood <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Travis,
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well that's fucking nuts. The man is an
> entertainer,
> > > > like Rush or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Glenn Beck.
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 24, 5:48 pm, Travis <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (He's at least as honest as the libturds on
> NBC, CBS,
> > > > ABC, CNN,
> > > > > > > > > > > > MSNBC)
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Time Poll: Jon Stewart Most Trusted Newscaster
> In
> > > > Americahttp://
> >
> > > >
> www.thehotjoints.com/2009/07/23/time-poll-jon-stewart-most-tru...Hide...
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to