And you pay far too much attention to what he says and not enough to 
what he does.

Hollywood wrote:
> dick,
>
>
> YOU do not decide what the POTUS SHOULD say. Thank God.
>
> On Sep 4, 11:55 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>> I have responded several times.  You just aren't bright enough to see
>> what is in front of you, I guess.
>>
>> Just from the MO of Zero, he will say things that skirt the limits of
>> what should be said and then the lesson plans will finish the job of
>> indoctrinating.  That way he has deniability and a finger to point at
>> the Dept of Ed if he gets in trouble for the speech.  He considers that
>> a win-win.  He has been doing that to his own people since he started
>> campaigning.
>>
>> Loved the comment from the libs that he should have given the speech and
>> then passed out the lesson plans.  That way nobody could have
>> complained.  Then there was also the comment that Reagan and Bush I both
>> talked to the students.  Difference was that they did not send out
>> lesson plans, they talked to actual students and they spoke in one
>> school and CSPAN chose to broadcast the speech.  Zero is not doing any
>> of those things.  Pure indoctrination.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hollywood wrote:
>>     
>>> dick,
>>>       
>>> Nothing else to say regarding the post of mine you are partially
>>> responding to?
>>>       
>>> On Sep 3, 4:07 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/academic/bts.html
>>>>         
>>>> Check the Classroom activities, and the frequently asked questions.  
>>>> Sent it before. This is from the Dept of Education.
>>>>         
>>>> Check what is in the Classroom activities with what was mentioned
>>>> before.  They are changing them because of all the complaints about the
>>>> slant that was taken and the pdf might have changed already.
>>>>         
>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> dick,
>>>>>           
>>>>> I don't see a guide from the Education Dept. that you sent. Please
>>>>> send me the link to that again.
>>>>>           
>>>>> ALL lobby organizations send political contributions to political
>>>>> parties, the most to the parties they believe will advance their
>>>>> particular agenda. What would make the Teacher's Union different from
>>>>> a Manufacturer's lobby, or the Agribusiness lobby or anyone else? I'm
>>>>> all for making ANY and ALL contributions ILLEGAL attempts to bribe
>>>>> public officials.
>>>>>           
>>>>> You can claim pretty much anything REALLY means something else if you
>>>>> wish to. proving it is a horse of a different color.
>>>>>           
>>>>> Really? Exactly who is it that controls promotions and transfers
>>>>> within a given school district? Is it the Federal Dept. Of Education?
>>>>> Is it the local school Board? Is it the local Teacher's Union, based
>>>>> on seniority & other factors? Are you trying to tell me that if an
>>>>> individual teacher in St. Louis wishes to transfer to a different
>>>>> school with the St. Luis District the decision is made by the Dept. of
>>>>> Education in Washington, D.C? Is that was you're saying?
>>>>>           
>>>>> On Sep 3, 2:11 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> The guide I sent was from the Dept of Education itself.  That is the one
>>>>>> they sent out originally and the one they are now revising because of
>>>>>> all the complaints.  You are not paying any attention at all, are you.
>>>>>>             
>>>>>> Why do you think the teachers unions give so much money and assistance
>>>>>> to the administration unless there is a quid pro quo.  You really don't
>>>>>> think beyond what the words say to what they are really meaning, do
>>>>>> you.  It is like the boss suggest that this section of a report might
>>>>>> need some review.  What he is saying is that you need to change that
>>>>>> section.  This is the same principle.
>>>>>>             
>>>>>> Of course they will not say it is REQUIRED.  What they mean though is
>>>>>> that if you want consideration for promotion or transfer to a better
>>>>>> position you had damned well better have the students watch the speech
>>>>>> and you had damned well better follow the curriculum.
>>>>>>             
>>>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> dick,
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> Nonesense.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> I have pointed out that no one has submitted one of these scary lesson
>>>>>>> plan guides.. Only what conservative bloggers, etc. have CLAIMED what
>>>>>>> they consist of and/or REALLY mean.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> I have pointed out that no teacher is REQUIRED to do jack-shit, only
>>>>>>> suggestions have been made and refuted the usage of the word "forced"
>>>>>>> by conservatives. Haven't seen anyone refute that.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> I have asked how "they", the Obama administration "controls" the
>>>>>>> teachers unions. No response to that either.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> No teacher is REQUIRED to even have his/her students watch the speech.
>>>>>>> No one has challenged that statement.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 1:02 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> You have said nothing except that anyone who disagrees with you is
>>>>>>>> talking BS.  Personally I think you are the one with the BS.  I did 
>>>>>>>> deal
>>>>>>>> with the issue very completely but you fail to see what any sane person
>>>>>>>> sees with this admin.
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>> dick,
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>> Hold up on the hysterical partisan ranting and deal with THIS issue
>>>>>>>>> and what you and I have said about it.
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>> Your talking bullshit and if you'd calm down you'd realize that. I'm
>>>>>>>>> not impressed by the Glenn Beck immitation.
>>>>>>>>> "They don't tell the teachers what to do" That's right they don't , so
>>>>>>>>> what are you riled up about?
>>>>>>>>> "They control the Teacher union". Who does and how?
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 11:01 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Remember all the talk about pragmatism in this president and we were
>>>>>>>>>> overreacting last fall before the election?  Look at what this POS 
>>>>>>>>>> admin
>>>>>>>>>> has done so far and tell me I am overreacting.  This is a crew who
>>>>>>>>>> thinks nothing matters but what they want.  You don't matter, your 
>>>>>>>>>> kids
>>>>>>>>>> don't matter, the country doesn't matter; only Zero matters and what 
>>>>>>>>>> he
>>>>>>>>>> wants to see done.  They are pulling all the various activities into 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> WH with their czars, they are now telling companies how much they can
>>>>>>>>>> pay people, they are naming people who are on record as being for
>>>>>>>>>> euthanasia and eugenics and doing away with the Hippocratic Oath - 
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> tell me I am over-reacting?  Open your eyes and see what is really 
>>>>>>>>>> going
>>>>>>>>>> on.  Do you think they are doing all this for the laughs and just for
>>>>>>>>>> something to do?
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>> Now you are changing the slant.  They don't tell the teachers what 
>>>>>>>>>> to do
>>>>>>>>>> but they send out the curricula to the teachers and they control the
>>>>>>>>>> teachers unions.  What do you think the teacher will do.  I don't 
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> to do this but if I don't I can kiss goodbye to any chance to get 
>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>> admin or get transferred to the good school.  That is the message 
>>>>>>>>>> here.  
>>>>>>>>>> Alarmist, hysterical nonsense be damned.  These people are serious 
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> this krep they are pulling and you sit there and think it is nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>> They pull something, it gets massively complained about, it gets 
>>>>>>>>>> pulled
>>>>>>>>>> back and we hear that someone did it without authorization and that
>>>>>>>>>> someone gets fired and then given another good job.  Over and over
>>>>>>>>>> again.  Their whole MO.  This is the crew that said the returning
>>>>>>>>>> military veterans were a threat to the country.  Did you complain 
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>> that one?  Wake up, fool!
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> dick,
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>> You are seriously over-reacting and the comparisons of President 
>>>>>>>>>>> Obama
>>>>>>>>>>> to Hitler, talk of "Brownshirts" etc, is alarmist, hysterical
>>>>>>>>>>> nonsense.
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>> I repeat, SHOW ME WHERE ANY TEACHER WILL BE FORCED TO SHOW THIS TO 
>>>>>>>>>>> HER/
>>>>>>>>>>> HIS CLASS.
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 9:20 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> I told you before.  I do not want the president asking the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> children to
>>>>>>>>>>>> help him when the message is given in the schools.  What he should 
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> doing is asking the parents to help see that their kids get 
>>>>>>>>>>>> educated.  
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong place to reach out to.  It smacks far too much of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> personality
>>>>>>>>>>>> cult.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>>> He asks them what they can do for him rather than what they can do 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> help themselves and their country.  He is not the country.  While 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I am
>>>>>>>>>>>> not a fan of the Kennedy clan, JFK did make a definite point in his
>>>>>>>>>>>> speech about ask not.  Zero is making it personal.  That is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> specifically
>>>>>>>>>>>> the problem I see with this.  The whole thrust of this lesson plan 
>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>> the problem.  If you cannot see that, then you are ripe for 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wearing your
>>>>>>>>>>>> uniform and doing your Sieg Heil salute.
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dick,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I did. What specific problems do you have with it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 2, 7:36 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you obviously didn't read the study guide that was passed out by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dept of Ed to go along with this speech.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hollywood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                             
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d.b.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WOW, what a terrible thing to do. To actually encourage young 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                               
>> ...
>>
>> read more ยป- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>>     
> >
>
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to