dick, Make up your damned mind. Do you want ALL our official business reported directly and immediately to the media or do you fucking NOT? OR are you simply saying you personally want to decide what the govt. should immediately report and what it should not based on who it might or might not hurt/help politically in YOUR opinion?
You sound like my first wife. You don't really know what it is you want I'm just supposed to somehow know and do it w/o your having to ask, much less explain your logic. On Sep 7, 9:39 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > Go back and look at what the NYT printed about how our intelligence > groups gather information and essentially told Al Qaeda what not to do. > They decided even after the WH and the DOD asked them not to that they > had to print this stuff. And you want me to tell you what Brits told > the president and the Sec of State what was going down? Who do you > think it would be. It would have to be from one of 2 offices, the PM or > the justice in Scotland. > > Now answer my question. Who told the NYT about our tracking cell phones > and investigating SWIFT transactions even though the Euro govts involved > all approved of it. What do you think Al Qaeda did with that info. Not > that they went to disposable phones and other means to get money > transferred that we could not track so easily. Who told them about > that. That should be a firing offense at the least and a court case in > reality. > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > dick, > > > Do you actually read your own posts? Look at this thread, you start it > > off whining and bitching because someone in the State Dept. (according > > to some anonymous Brit) did NOT immediately inform the media of > > CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS. You end it by whining and bitching about > > someone who DID inform the media. > > > <<<<All our security intel info to the NYT>>>> ALL???? > > > On Sep 7, 2:50 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Like I said, tell me who gave all our security intel info to the NYT and > >> I will tell you who the Brits are. > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > >>> dick, > > >>> Key phrase here is "IF they were apprised". I take note you go not > >>> gives the names and offcial titles of the Brits who claim this. > > >>> LOL, IF it actually happened what requires the State Dept. to report > >>> every conversation with every foreign government to the news media? > > >>> Thought so, you've no idea in the fucking world who these Brits are, > >>> or even if they exist. :-) > > >>> On Sep 6, 7:20 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> If they were apprised and said nothing then they were stupid. If they > >>>> said something then our media should have been apprised also. The fact > >>>> that it even happened at all and the Brits told our President and our > >>>> Sec of State and nothing appeared in the newspapers or on the television > >>>> news tells me that our leaders are not in sync with what the people of > >>>> the country believe. Look at the way the public has responded to this > >>>> happening. > > >>>> As soon as you name the Americans who gave material to the NYT about our > >>>> intelligence services. > > >>>> Hollywood wrote: > > >>>>> dick, > > >>>>> Why on earth should they be "held accountable" for an agreement > >>>>> between the nations of Libya, Scotland and England? Please take note > >>>>> of your own words, "were kept apprised" and NOT consulted or asked > >>>>> permission and or for approval. > > >>>>> Name the Brits who made this staement and their position in the > >>>>> current British government. > > >>>>> On Sep 6, 5:33 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1211495/No-10-turns-Obama-Cli... > > >>>>>> Brits are saying that Zero and Hillary were kept apprised of what was > >>>>>> going on all the time. If so, then they should be held accountable for > >>>>>> that.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
