dick, Exactly how can this incident affect America's National Security? Fine maybe the NYT should not have printed it, I don't know. But it's the job of the FBI to investigate such things. You don't like it? Ok, you don't like it, so what?
On Sep 7, 11:09 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > And this can very easily affect our security. After all this guy was a > terrorist. The laws are very specific on releasing intelligence info. > I worked in that community the entire time I was in the Army and was > made very aware of what the laws had to say about classified info. What > the NYT printed was way out of line and should never have been printed > at all. > > > > Hollywood wrote: > > dick, > > > Only wish it would have happened years before it did. > > > No one cares what you want Dick, don't you understand that very few > > people in this world give the slightest damn what you think is > > "proper"? We have laws and regulations that regulate such things. Some > > administrations do a better job in certain areas, at certain times, > > than other administrations do. > > > Do you not understand that agreements between sovereign nations are > > simple pretty much none of our business unless they directly threaten > > our national security? > > And ALL this thread is bullshit anyway because at this point in time > > the entire subject is nothing more than unverified RUMOR. Of no more > > significance, at this point, than two old ladies gossipping over a > > backyard fence. > > > On Sep 7, 10:25 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Your first wife was smart enough to get rid of you. > > >> What I want is that the president and the media cover the news properly, > >> keeping secret what our intelligence agents are working with and > >> reporting what is pertinent to the people. How our intelligence agents > >> get their info is classified info. The fact that someone is going to be > >> released from prison is not. > > >> Hollywood wrote: > > >>> dick, > > >>> Make up your damned mind. Do you want ALL our official business > >>> reported directly and immediately to the media or do you fucking NOT? > >>> OR are you simply saying you personally want to decide what the govt. > >>> should immediately report and what it should not based on who it might > >>> or might not hurt/help politically in YOUR opinion? > > >>> You sound like my first wife. You don't really know what it is you > >>> want I'm just supposed to somehow know and do it w/o your having to > >>> ask, much less explain your logic. > > >>> On Sep 7, 9:39 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> Go back and look at what the NYT printed about how our intelligence > >>>> groups gather information and essentially told Al Qaeda what not to do. > >>>> They decided even after the WH and the DOD asked them not to that they > >>>> had to print this stuff. And you want me to tell you what Brits told > >>>> the president and the Sec of State what was going down? Who do you > >>>> think it would be. It would have to be from one of 2 offices, the PM or > >>>> the justice in Scotland. > > >>>> Now answer my question. Who told the NYT about our tracking cell phones > >>>> and investigating SWIFT transactions even though the Euro govts involved > >>>> all approved of it. What do you think Al Qaeda did with that info. Not > >>>> that they went to disposable phones and other means to get money > >>>> transferred that we could not track so easily. Who told them about > >>>> that. That should be a firing offense at the least and a court case in > >>>> reality. > > >>>> Hollywood wrote: > > >>>>> dick, > > >>>>> Do you actually read your own posts? Look at this thread, you start it > >>>>> off whining and bitching because someone in the State Dept. (according > >>>>> to some anonymous Brit) did NOT immediately inform the media of > >>>>> CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS. You end it by whining and bitching about > >>>>> someone who DID inform the media. > > >>>>> <<<<All our security intel info to the NYT>>>> ALL???? > > >>>>> On Sep 7, 2:50 am, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>> Like I said, tell me who gave all our security intel info to the NYT > >>>>>> and > >>>>>> I will tell you who the Brits are. > > >>>>>> Hollywood wrote: > > >>>>>>> dick, > > >>>>>>> Key phrase here is "IF they were apprised". I take note you go not > >>>>>>> gives the names and offcial titles of the Brits who claim this. > > >>>>>>> LOL, IF it actually happened what requires the State Dept. to report > >>>>>>> every conversation with every foreign government to the news media? > > >>>>>>> Thought so, you've no idea in the fucking world who these Brits are, > >>>>>>> or even if they exist. :-) > > >>>>>>> On Sep 6, 7:20 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> If they were apprised and said nothing then they were stupid. If > >>>>>>>> they > >>>>>>>> said something then our media should have been apprised also. The > >>>>>>>> fact > >>>>>>>> that it even happened at all and the Brits told our President and our > >>>>>>>> Sec of State and nothing appeared in the newspapers or on the > >>>>>>>> television > >>>>>>>> news tells me that our leaders are not in sync with what the people > >>>>>>>> of > >>>>>>>> the country believe. Look at the way the public has responded to > >>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>> happening. > > >>>>>>>> As soon as you name the Americans who gave material to the NYT about > >>>>>>>> our > >>>>>>>> intelligence services. > > >>>>>>>> Hollywood wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> dick, > > >>>>>>>>> Why on earth should they be "held accountable" for an agreement > >>>>>>>>> between the nations of Libya, Scotland and England? Please take note > >>>>>>>>> of your own words, "were kept apprised" and NOT consulted or asked > >>>>>>>>> permission and or for approval. > > >>>>>>>>> Name the Brits who made this staement and their position in the > >>>>>>>>> current British government. > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 5:33 pm, dick thompson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1211495/No-10-turns-Obama-Cli... > > >>>>>>>>>> Brits are saying that Zero and Hillary were kept apprised of what > >>>>>>>>>> was > >>>>>>>>>> going on all the time. If so, then they should be held > >>>>>>>>>> accountable for > >>>>>>>>>> that.- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
