gun owners are in the midst of a “culture war
---
no ... they're just trying to defend their right to self-defense.

it's way past time for the USSC to rule on the meaning of the second
amendment.
I suspect those with guns will win the argument.

On May 6, 7:46 pm, Bruce Majors <[email protected]> wrote:
> <http://weeklyintercept.blogspot.com/2012/08/adam-kokesh-has-had-enoug...>
>
> Ever since New York’s SAFE Act and new restrictions in other states further
> encroaching on law abiding gun owners’ right to keep and bear were enacted
> in the wake of Sandy Hook, the tectonic pressures have been building. You
> can feel it within mainstream organizations such as the NRA, where gun
> owners are in the midst of a “culture
> war<http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/04/politics/nra-lapierre/index.html>.”
> You can certainly see it in the murkier corners of the intertubes where he
> who shall not have hair
> <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2260806/James-Yeager-threaten...>openly
> promised to “start killing people” if someone comes for his guns. The stage
> has been set for an otherwise innocuous – or overtly provocative – incident
> to get out of control. It’ll get real ugly real fast. Radio host Adam
> Kokesh seems just the man to set off the seismic tsunami . . .
>
> salon.com<http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/a_march_on_washington_with_loaded_rif...>
> is
> reporting that Kokesh is planning a July 4 March on Washington. He’s
> looking to assemble 1000 like-minded pro-2A folks and march across the
> Memorial Bridge from Virginia into “gun free” D.C. With loaded rifles.
>
> The gun control industry laughs at the idea of law-abiding gun owners
> pitting their pitiful guns to stand up against to tyranny. Reacting to a
> report that 44% of Republicans (vs. 18% of Democrats) think that an armed
> revolution might be necessary, Bill Maher let out a loud
> guffaw<http://news.yahoo.com/bill-maher-ridiculous-quaint-nonsensical-think-...>
> :
>
> Can we get to, first of all, how ridiculous it is for people to think
> that the Second Amendment protects them from tyranny. Didn’t Waco solve
> that?  We just had the anniversary a couple of weeks ago.  Remember Waco?
> You know what they had in Waco? They had like 1.9 million rounds of
> ammunition; they had .50 caliber machine guns; they had grenades…What did
> the government have? Everything else. The winner and still champion –
> the United States government.  Thinking the Second Amendment protects you
> from tyranny is like thinking the First Amendment protects you from Thor.
> It’s quaint. It’s ridiculous. It’s nonsensical. And they never get called
> [on] it!
>
> For his part, Kokesh (which sounds disturbingly
> Koresh<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Koresh>ian)
> is calling his little soiree the Open Carry March on Washington. Here’s the
> description of the event from his facebook
> page<https://www.facebook.com/events/252728144871259/?ref=3>
> :
>
> On the morning of July 4, 2013, Independence Day, we will muster at the
> National Cemetery & at noon we will step off to march across the Memorial
> Bridge, down Independence Avenue, around the Capitol, the Supreme Court, &
> the White House, then peacefully return to Virginia across the Memorial
> Bridge. This is an act of civil disobedience, not a permitted event. We
> will march with rifles loaded & slung across our backs to put the
> government on notice that we will not be intimidated & cower in submission
> to tyranny. We are marching to mark the high water mark of government & to
> turn the tide. This will be a non-violent event, unless the government
> chooses to make it violent. Should we meet physical resistance, we will
> peacefully turn back, having shown that free people are not welcome in
> Washington, & returning with the resolve that the politicians, bureaucrats,
> & enforcers of the federal government will not be welcome in the land of
> the free.
>
> Would the D.C. police act to stop them from crossing that bridge from
> Arlington into the capitol? Wouldn’t they almost have to? Allowing armed
> marchers to flout the law, brazenly carrying locally illegal firearms,
> would set a rather uncomfortable precedent for the nation’s seat of power.
>
> And what happens then? What if, despite Kokesh’s pledge to peacefully do an
> about face, one of his fellow marchers, met by resistance from law
> enforcement, is stupid (or careless) enough to crack off a shot? With a
> battalion of armed riflemen encountering a phalanx of DCPD, one shot could
> (and probably would) quickly turn into many more. And a very bloody,
> terribly ugly incident. All filmed for the evening news.
>
> Even if Kokesh’s provocative procession comes off peacefully, this will
> likely be the first of many of these. A March on Albany holding mags with 8
> rounds loaded in the air? Another one on Denver sporting full Magpul
> 30-round mags? The potential is there for any one of those types of
> situations — or another one entirely — to go south. And then what?
> You may also like -
>
>    - GRAA-CA Announces 'Day of Citizen Action'
>
>    <http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/04/daniel-zimmerman/graa-ca-ann...>
>    - Secret Dem Push to Put Gun Dealers in the Crosshairs
>
>    <http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/03/robert-farago/secret-dem-pus...>
>    - 3 Reasons Why 7-Round Mag Cap Limits Are Good for Gun Rights
>
>    <http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/02/robert-farago/3-reasons-why-...>
>    - An Alternative Way to Combat Gun Control
>
>    <http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/02/jim-barrett/an-alternative-w...>
>    - LEO L.C. Judas: Gun Ownership and Crime
>
>    <http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/12/robert-farago/leo-l-c-judas-...>
>
> [image: 
> Share]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetruthabout...>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to