Hello, > On 7/8/15 1:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Looking at PolicyKit 0.3, it does include some files using that license, > > but it also says > >> The PolicyKit command-line tools are licensed to you under the GNU > >> General Public License version 2. > > This license comment is from a header file (libpolkit.h, the contents of > which does not match any libpolkit.h that I have seen in a PolicyKit > source release).
> >> libpolkit is licensed to you under your choice of the Academic Free > >> License version 2.1, or the GNU General Public License version 2. > > which seems definitive enough. Also, David is listed as the original > > (only?) author, so I wonder why he redirected the query elsewhere. > > AFL 2.1 or GPLv2 is what the people who integrated the code thought and > they selected AFL 2.1. Then a subsequent legal review looked at the > actual license information in each file and found what I reported above, > which is ambiguous. > > I was hoping that, as the author, David Z. would just confirm it is AFL > 2.1 or GPLv2, but, instead, he referred me to you guys, the current > maintainers. You are asking us about a file with non-public, unknown to us, contents and history, probably originating from a time before my involvement in the project? I don’t know about Colin, but I see no reason why my opinion should carry any authority on what is or is not the intent of the author, or how can I even have an opinion on this question about such an (almost hypothetical) file. Mirek _______________________________________________ polkit-devel mailing list polkit-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/polkit-devel