On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Eric Eslinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes. Angular-material is good if you already use angular, and does not use > webcomponents to implement the design spec. Notably, if you use angular, > you should use angular-material as the newer polymer shady / local dom > implementation does not look to be out-of-the-box compatible with angular > (both libraries do dom manipulation, but polymer requires all dom > manipulation to go through its local dom api, see my other thread about > this). > > MaterializeCSS is a nice material design implementation (I haven't used it > for anything real, but I did run through some demo code with it to see how > it works) that is also not webcomponents-based. Furthermore, MaterializeCSS > doesn't use flexbox for layouts, and does have a jquery dependency for its > javascript controls. > > So: they're all different approaches to the material design spec. > Materialize is the most agnostic in terms of the rest of your framework, > ngMaterial is an angular-only thing, and paper-components are built on > polymer/webcomponents. Depends on the rest of your application. > I do like to point out that custom elements at least hold the promise of working with any framework or existing app/page - they're just elements. That's the point of all this work :) -Justin > e > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:18 AM 王納米 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Peng, >> >> About your last question, AFAIK, material design is just a design spec, >> angular-material and paper-elements are two different implementations. >> Polymer itself does nothing about it. >> >> NanoWANG >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 12:18 PM Peng Kim <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi,Eric >>> >>> Thanks for replying >>> >>> I think we have reason to cut out IE browser,because it is passed ,MS >>> has published a new browser Edge which is isolated from IE, and this is new >>> era of web,we should think about the future.Because I'm from China,and my >>> customers are almost Chinese,So,in addition to the popular browsers like >>> chrome,Firefox,safari,opera,etc,we have our own browsers which is based on >>> chrome V8 engine,but they are quite different from chrome on displaying or >>> anything compatibility stuff,so,it is quite hard to me to make decision. >>> >>> I found AngularJS has its own Material design libs, >>> https://material.angularjs.org ,what is the differences between >>> Polymer and Materialize http://materializecss.com/ , when you choose >>> what Material design libs work with Angular,why Polymer?not angular >>> materializer or something else? >>> >>> Peng >>> >>> Best Regards >>> >>> On Saturday, May 30, 2015 at 5:00:15 AM UTC+8, Eric Eslinger wrote: >>> >>>> I am not on the polymer team, but in my own experience: >>>> >>>> 1) polymer works well (especially polymer 1.0 with the new shady dom) >>>> on modern browsers; like last two versions of stuff. So not IE8, but it >>>> works on IE11 in my experience. It doesn't run well (or at all) on the old >>>> stock android browser, but mobile chrome / safari run it fine on modern >>>> phones. >>>> >>>> 3) Angularjs works just fine with polymer when polymer is in full >>>> shadow-dom mode, but that introduces browser slowness and some >>>> incompatibilities. In shady DOM mode, (see my earlier thread) at the >>>> current time, angular's DOM manipulation functions (ng-if, ng-repeat, etc) >>>> will alter the DOM without telling polymer that the DOM was just altered, >>>> which can potentially lead to errors in class isolation, where the css >>>> classes don't get distributed properly to newly-added stuff. >>>> >>>> e >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:20 AM Peng Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>> Hi,Polymer team >>>>> >>>>> I was so exciting when i saw the brand new official version 1.0 of >>>>> Polymer ,Thanks to the Polymer team for bringing us so amazing stuff.I >>>>> cant >>>>> wait trying it out for my big project.But I want to eliminate my worries >>>>> and doubts before utilize it in my project. >>>>> >>>>> 1,What about the compatibility?does it work great on >>>>> IE7-11?safari5+?chrome*?firefox*?opera*?and even in mobile built-in >>>>> browser? >>>>> >>>>> 2,Can this version be used for social networking website or e-commerce >>>>> website for a company? >>>>> >>>>> 3,I want to use it with Angularjs,what is the best practice to work >>>>> well with Angularjs? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advanced,Any reply will be appreciated! >>>>> >>>>> Peng >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards >>>>> >>>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>>>> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> >>>> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/1d345c35-6758-4393-9a23-d2c4c3a919a4%40googlegroups.com >>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/1d345c35-6758-4393-9a23-d2c4c3a919a4%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>> . >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Polymer" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/bd97d9fe-2c97-41ff-b136-228bcacf6b0d%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/bd97d9fe-2c97-41ff-b136-228bcacf6b0d%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Polymer" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CANnpEN_FH1fQFVLpxrZHu-CVSg1Kv-ZLKsG-RVeLGW%3Du7EgwkA%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CANnpEN_FH1fQFVLpxrZHu-CVSg1Kv-ZLKsG-RVeLGW%3Du7EgwkA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Polymer" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CABsi40%2BgBBDcwZtfY8%2B%2B_g7DsaNEkZbp9gkFA8M6RXtWpDTqcA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CABsi40%2BgBBDcwZtfY8%2B%2B_g7DsaNEkZbp9gkFA8M6RXtWpDTqcA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CAEKsHmDhzkYZQ%2BPq_Bzo575o9V90UTSVag812fh0eEOLbuP1Vg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
