On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 4:39:49 AM UTC-4, Joern Turner wrote:. > > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017 22:41:40 UTC+2 schrieb arthure: >> >> To answer your questions: yes, there's a lot of interest in a declarative >> templates (a.k.a., "writing HTML in HTML"). Many of the team members feel >> the same way you do. We'd love to see a solution—ideally a standards-based >> solution that doesn't require a build step. There is currently a standards >> discussion around "HTML modules", but it's somewhat unclear how that will >> play out. The minimal case would _only_ allow you to define HTML in an HTML >> module. A more elaborate version would allow script to be embedded in the >> module, as well, allowing single-file components like we have in Polymer 2. >> > > It's a relief to hear that i'm not alone with my point of view. I've > been waiting for such a solution to come along and it would be a nightmare > if that gets dropped again. Btw, is there any resource where to follow the > W3C discussions? I wasn't able to find anything like a community group or > something. >
I thought the blog post was example, I didn't think it was only way. So for the record : Yes, very much against this. This makes <template> pretty much useless. The rest of the items, prefer the way it was in P2, but totally understand greater good of the compromises. Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/5500e1dd-b7fe-4335-a8c8-35d64b60c750%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
