The problem isnt Javascript, the problem is CSS and relying on overly general CSS selectors... You've still failed to elaborate on this extremely flamboyant claim of "flat out ignores virtually all of the Javascript libraries in existence". 1 question about 1 library is not cause for such an alarmist response. It is also worth noting that the problem isnt Polymer 0.5, 0.8, 1.x, 2.x or even 3.x, this is the nature of Web Components.
Rob Dodson wrote a pretty good explanation surrounding jQuery plugins that explains my first statement - http://robdodson.me/dont-use-jquery-with-shadow-dom/ -Karl Tiedt On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Egor Egorov <[email protected]> wrote: > > See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/polymer-dev/vB7upjV_z7s/5Hk9BJFTAAAJ > - no replies. No one uses Bootstrap with Polymer? > > Am I right assuming that basically anything jQuery-based is a no go? > > > On Saturday, September 23, 2017 at 3:01:06 AM UTC+3, Karl Tiedt wrote: >> >> Please elaborate on this, " and 2.0 flat-out ignores virtually all of >> the javascript libraries in existence"... I worked with many 3rd party >> libraries and so have many people... In fact you can find these >> integrations on GitHub and the web components website... >> >> On Sep 22, 2017 18:49, "Egor Egorov" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> We are running a huge enterprise application written with Polymer 1.0 and >> Bootstrap. Now what we face is a bit of devastating: 1.0 is going to stop >> working around Chrome 63 and 2.0 flat-out ignores virtually all of the >> javascript libraries in existence, hence no Bootstrap on Polymer 2.0. As >> much as we love Polymer 1.0, we have found no way to integrate existing JS >> libraries we use with the 2.0. >> >> What would be a good migration path for a Polymer 1.0 application? >> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Polymer" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ms >> gid/polymer-dev/78829894-3022-417b-9624-e3cd1c02656c%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/78829894-3022-417b-9624-e3cd1c02656c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Polymer" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/polymer-dev/edac8597-c940-4abf-9e19-e5adcab1bde7%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/edac8597-c940-4abf-9e19-e5adcab1bde7%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/CADNgbTEFAo2seLEkpVSZJckuH7_H7nAYGE4TLTX%3D5QCry%2B_9Vg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
