Thank you very much for the suggestion! I apologize for the harsh words.
On Saturday, September 23, 2017 at 3:52:41 AM UTC+3, arthure wrote: > > Hi Egor, > > I'm not sure what you mean about 1.0 not working with Chrome 63. The only > change I see in Chrome 63 that might affect Polymer apps is that the /deep/ > combinator will no longer pierce shadow trees. Which will affect people who > are using native shadow DOM on Chrome with 1.0; but if you're using > Bootstrap with Polymer, in all probability you are *not* using native > shadow DOM, and this shouldn't affect you. All of YouTube's new UI (to name > just one site) is running Polymer 1.x, and you can be pretty sure that > Chrome is not going to roll out a change that breaks YouTube. > > As for 2.0, the difference here—since bootstrap-type global CSS selectors > won't work with either v0 or v1 shadow DOM—is that 2.0 uses native shadow > DOM by default. You can get around that by forcing the shady DOM polyfills > to run even on browsers with native shadow DOM. Of course, it won't be as > performant as native shadow DOM. > > https://www.polymer-project.org/2.0/docs/polyfills#settings > > Thanks, > Arthur > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Egor Egorov <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> We are running a huge enterprise application written with Polymer 1.0 and >> Bootstrap. Now what we face is a bit of devastating: 1.0 is going to stop >> working around Chrome 63 and 2.0 flat-out ignores virtually all of the >> javascript libraries in existence, hence no Bootstrap on Polymer 2.0. As >> much as we love Polymer 1.0, we have found no way to integrate existing JS >> libraries we use with the 2.0. >> >> What would be a good migration path for a Polymer 1.0 application? >> >> Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Polymer" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/78829894-3022-417b-9624-e3cd1c02656c%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/78829894-3022-417b-9624-e3cd1c02656c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > Follow Polymer on Google+: plus.google.com/107187849809354688692 --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Polymer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/polymer-dev/fbc7faf2-763d-48ff-8183-1c8889579e83%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
