On Jun 6, 2011, at 22:59, "Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]> wrote:
> For the use case I envision (production-style support for v6-only > hosts), it doesn't really matter whether ipv6.pool is IPv6-enabled > or IPv6-only - the v6-only hosts would go only after AAAA records, > anyway. For now I think just having AAAA in one of the sub-zones is a reasonable compromise for having it be "real production" with low risk. As the IPv6 coverage gets closer in quality and quantity to the IPv4 coverage we can add it to more of the sub-zones. -- http://askask.com/ _______________________________________________ pool mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
