> It's hard to distinguish "cable in the middle that just affects the 
> monitoring server" from "some other similar problem that'd affect many 
> peoples connectivity to that server" so I think it's reasonable for 
> the system to error on the side of caution.
> 
> Only in very unusual edge cases is there any cost to disabling a 
> server from the pool for a few hours.  On the other hand the 
> reliability of the system goes down if we *don't* disable a server 
> that may have some sort of trouble.

I agree.

Just a note:
Network problems affecting monitoring host itself may be eliminated
by using more than one measurement points. I.e. proxies.
I'd be happy to create and manage such a proxy. We just have
to figure out some convenient interface. :-)

Regards

Gabor
_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to