On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 21:02, Hal Murray wrote: > > mar...@v.loewis.de (mailto:mar...@v.loewis.de) said: > > OTTH, there is also a less-real chance that someone is negatively affected > > by the status quo - if they have an IPv6-only node, they would only get one > > time server configured, even though three different servers would be readily > > available. > > That should get fixed when when the current ntp-dev code gets released and > widely deployed and people start using the pool command. > > Can anybody test the pool command in a IPv6 only environment? For what it's worth: I'm using it on some of my boxes at home; though they have IPv4, too. It's working fine as far as I can tell except for the quirk that you get twice as many active servers when you are dual stacked compared to if you are not. I haven't monitored the failure/replacement stuff.
Ask -- Ask Bjørn Hansen - http://askask.com/ _______________________________________________ pool mailing list pool@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
