Additional note to my last mail:

Maybe there are enough ATLAS probes located in Brazil to clarify the mystic 
10kpps occurence ;-)


Max


Am 01.06.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Max Grobecker:
> 
> Am 01.06.2015 um 18:25 schrieb Rob Janssen:
> 
>> Sure, but unsolicited "research" is not appreciated by lots of network 
>> operators.
> 
> If you don't want unsolicited research, you won't setup an ATLAS probe on 
> your network ;-)
> The main purpose of the ATLAS probes is to measure network reachability and 
> quality on user
> defined targets, so there is no intelligent way to put an ATLAS probe in a 
> strictly filtered network environment.
> 
> 
> In general, I would appreciate a second monitoring system for the whole NTP 
> pool since you eleminate the "single point of failure"
> and you are also able to test/check the GeoDNS-Features of the pool name 
> servers and load balancing.
> 
> 
> Max
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pool mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
pool mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool

Reply via email to