On 02/24/2010 10:33 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Dimecres, 24 de febrer de 2010, Pablo Rodríguez va escriure: >> Hi there, >> >> I have just discovered that evince (and also xpdf) is much slower >> dealing with PDF 1.5 documents than it is with the same document in PDF >> 1.4. >> >> Here you have the test (generated both with XeLaTeX): >> >> http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/Guidelines.pdf (PDF 1.4) >> http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/Guidelines.pdf (PDF 1.5, much smaller) >> >> Evince and pdfinfo show a huge difference when opening both versions and >> acroread 9.3 and mupdf-r938 show almost an irrelevant one. >> >> Tests bellow (correct me if I'm wrong). Guidelines.pdf is the PDF 1.5 >> document and TEI_Guidelines.pdf is the PDF 1.4 document. > > Unless you are going to develop a fix, please file a bug report or this will > end up lost in the history of the list.
Sorry, Albert. I'm not using the latest version from poppler, so I wanted to know whether this was already been fixed (but I forgot to mention it too :-)). I'll report the bug right now. > On the other hand i don't see why you are surprised, one file is compressed, > the other is not, thus reading the compressed file takes longer. > > On the other hand probably it can be made faster, yes. I'm not good at math, but it takes only 25-30% longer with acroread and mupdf to open the compressed file. Thanks, Pablo _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
