A Dijous, 25 de febrer de 2010, Pablo Rodríguez va escriure: > On 02/24/2010 10:33 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Dimecres, 24 de febrer de 2010, Pablo Rodríguez va escriure: > >> Hi there, > >> > >> I have just discovered that evince (and also xpdf) is much slower > >> dealing with PDF 1.5 documents than it is with the same document in PDF > >> 1.4. > >> > >> Here you have the test (generated both with XeLaTeX): > >> > >> http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/Guidelines.pdf (PDF 1.4) > >> http://users.ox.ac.uk/~rahtz/Guidelines.pdf (PDF 1.5, much smaller) > >> > >> Evince and pdfinfo show a huge difference when opening both versions and > >> acroread 9.3 and mupdf-r938 show almost an irrelevant one. > >> > >> Tests bellow (correct me if I'm wrong). Guidelines.pdf is the PDF 1.5 > >> document and TEI_Guidelines.pdf is the PDF 1.4 document. > > > > Unless you are going to develop a fix, please file a bug report or this > > will end up lost in the history of the list. > > Sorry, Albert. I'm not using the latest version from poppler, so I > wanted to know whether this was already been fixed (but I forgot to > mention it too :-)). > > I'll report the bug right now.
Thanks, in the future please do not set severity to major for a so simple and for sure not major issue. Albert > > > On the other hand i don't see why you are surprised, one file is > > compressed, the other is not, thus reading the compressed file takes > > longer. > > > > On the other hand probably it can be made faster, yes. > > I'm not good at math, but it takes only 25-30% longer with acroread and > mupdf to open the compressed file. > > Thanks, > > > Pablo > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
