A Dijous, 3 de novembre de 2011, Josh Richardson vàreu escriure: > I noticed that there is some use of std::string in the codebase. I think > GooString is historical, but it does provide some number conversion > facilities that are a little less straightforward with std::string. For > the most part GooString has met my needs for pdftohtml, and where it > hasn't, I've extended it, because for consistency it seems like a good > choice -- don't know if that's right or wrong. It's a good question.
The general answer is, for poppler core code, use GooString since it probably has what you want and it gives consistency, for pdftohtml-only code feel free to use whatever you want. Albert > > --josh > > On 11/3/11 10:43 PM, "Alec Taylor" <[email protected]> wrote: > >Good evening, > > > >Why should I use GooString instead of std::string? > > > >I've been very careful so far with my patches to only using GooString. > >But I was wondering if there is a specific added feature set (i.e. > >UTF16) which can only be achieved with your custom GooString library. > > > >Thanks for all information, > > > >Alec Taylor > >_______________________________________________ > >poppler mailing list > >[email protected] > >http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler > > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
