A Dissabte, 5 de novembre de 2011, Alec Taylor vàreu escriure: > As you say, that only used to be a problem in stdlib, it is no longer a > problem. > > There are various features of std::string not present in GooString, > which I need for my patches to poppler.
As i said, if it is for use in pdftohtml, go for it, use std::string. Albert > > Most obviously, it is missing a substr() member. > > Are there any restrictions/problems with the current std::string when > compared with GooString? > > > As far as presence of GooString in public API is concerned, I guess it > > comes from the fact (or FUD otherwise) that putting template C++ > > classes in public API is considered ABI-unsafe (easier to break). And > > while there aren't any issues with STL in this regard recently, Boost > > for instance would be a different story. > > So GooString would be safe alternative. > > > > regards > > MM > > _______________________________________________ > poppler mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler _______________________________________________ poppler mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/poppler
