On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote: > Is your problem fixed by replacing "char++" with POPT_next_char() ? > If it's right, I think POPT_fprintf() does need to be reverted.
I'm a bit clueless regarding the code. It's mostly Jeff's work and I hacked the rest to get a "working" popt for Fedora. Replacing POPT_fprintf() by the previous fprintf() seems to work around the problems, which ends from my point of view in: POPT_fprintf() has problems with non-ASCII characters when the locale isn't a UTF8 one. Do you mean "ch++;" vs. "ch = POPT_next_char(ch)"? I can't see any big difference there, as far as POPT_fprintf() vs. fprintf() brought visible results to me only. Greetings, Robert ______________________________________________________________________ POPT Library http://rpm5.org Developer Communication List popt-devel@rpm5.org
