Hi Ed, We haven't test it on the Unmatched, so I don' t know the answer. And the unmatched board may be not available for us until Feb. 2021 at the earliest.
Yadong -----Original Message----- From: porters-dev [mailto:porters-dev-r...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Edward Nevill Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 5:02 AM To: porters-dev@openjdk.java.net Subject: Re: openjdk riscv64 port On Tue, 2020-12-29 at 02:02 +0000, wangyadong (E) wrote: > Hi, > We implemented a RV64G port of OpenJDK11u(TemplateInterpreter, C1 and C2) > and open source to https://gitee.com/openeuler/bishengjdk-11/tree/risc-v/ . > Would the community like to help us to create a project? And then we can > promote it stable with the community. > > Yadong Wang > Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. > Hi, In order to progress this a riscv-port project will need to be created. There was an initial attempt to get a riscv-port project started in Feb. 2018 (see https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/porters-dev/2018-February/thread.html). The process for creation of a new OpenJDK project is described at http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#new-project In accordance with the OpenJDK bylaws the initial discussion should be sent to the general discussion list, discuss.at.openjdk.dot.java.dot.net with the subject line "Call for Discussion: New Project: riscv-port". However, it may be best to have an initial discussion here on porters-dev before submitting the formal Call for Discussion on discuss. The project will need a project lead who must be a Contributor and must be sponsored by a Group Lead. Although technically any Group Lead could sponsor this project, in practice it should be the Group Lead of the porters project, Dalibor Topic. All the best, Ed.
